- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:35:03 +0000
- To: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I'm working through some outstanding TODO issues in PROV-AQ.
There are some notes for discussion of potential privacy concerns. Based on
these notes, I've drafted the following, which might be controversial:
[[
Provenance information may provide a route for leakage of
privacy-related information, combining as it does a diversity of information
types with possible personally-identifying information; e.g. editing timestamps
may provide clues to the working patterns of document editors, or derivation
traces might indicate access to sensitive materials. In particular, note that
the fact that a resource is openly accessible does not mean that its provenance
information should also be. When publishing provenance, its sensitivity should
be considered and appropriate access controls applied where necessary. When a
provenance-aware publishing service accepts some resource for publication, the
contributors should have some opportunity to review and correct or conceal any
provenance information that they don't wish to be exposed.
]]
Are there any objections to this?
#g
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 14:36:23 UTC