Re: future-proofing prov-o.owl (and "namespace concatenation")

>>>>> I wonder whether we should not use extension-less URI-s everywhere, eg, http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120724, and let conneg work to choose among RDF/XML or turtle versions.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> That is what I would prefer. But I think we're bending certain ways to help the bad tooling that is out there.
>>>> The tradeoff that is in place is to point to the extension less URIs using specializationOf.
>>> 
>>> You mean that is what you will do (at the moment, all the URI-s have an extension)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I meant that I would prefer to not use extension-less URI-s everywhere and let conneg work.
>> Are you saying to just do it that way?
>> 
> 
> That would be my preference, unless we hit some practical issue.
> 
> Ivan


Great. Then I'll press forward with that.

prov-wg, speak now or forever hold your peace….

-Tim

Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:20:55 UTC