W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: about the implementation questionnaire

From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:22:21 -0600
Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5A11B61D-14F2-4DE5-9378-0C8DBF4263F5@rpi.edu>
To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi Stephan and team,
> While reading the questionnaire, some questions came up.  We may want to
> provide some clarification.
> - What are we expecting for the entry 'attribute'?

I believe you are referring to the first question in the branch for language implementation (page 2 in the form source) which asks about whether the implementation consumes/produces/consumes & produces/does not support a term of the language.

I think this was a catch-all term for the implementation being able to handle arbitrary attributes.  Perhaps we should change this to 'arbitrary attributes' 'user defined attributes' or something similar?

I changed to 'User Defined Attributes' for the time being.

> - What are we expecting for the entries 'location', 'value' and 'role'?

Does the implementation support these specific PROV-DM defined attributes? (In the appropriate manner for the implementation supported language - PROV-O, PROV-XML, PROV-N, other)

> - Why not mention type and label?

I do not recall why these are not present, I have added them.


> Thanks,
> Luc
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 15:22:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 November 2012 15:22:51 GMT