- Re: [dxwg] DCAT sptial resolution (#777) Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT sptial resolution (#777) Nicholas Car via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777) Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777) Annette Greiner via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777) Simon Cox via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777) Annette Greiner via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777) Simon Cox via GitHub (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777) makxdekkers via GitHub (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777) Simon Cox via GitHub (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777) Annette Greiner via GitHub (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771) makxdekkers via GitHub (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771) Nicholas Car via GitHub (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771) kcoyle via GitHub (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771) Simon Cox via GitHub (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771) kcoyle via GitHub (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771) tombaker via GitHub (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771) Simon Cox via GitHub (Sunday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771) kcoyle via GitHub (Sunday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771) Simon Cox via GitHub (Sunday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771) makxdekkers via GitHub (Monday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771) Simon Cox via GitHub (Monday, 25 February)
dxwg-ACTION-298: Issue #38 Dataset Exchange Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 19 February)
dxwg-ACTION-297: Check issue #37 Dataset Exchange Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) kcoyle via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) kcoyle via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) kcoyle via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) kcoyle via GitHub (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) kcoyle via GitHub (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) kcoyle via GitHub (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) kcoyle via GitHub (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Saturday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) kcoyle via GitHub (Saturday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) kcoyle via GitHub (Sunday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Sunday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Sunday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) kcoyle via GitHub (Monday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) kcoyle via GitHub (Monday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Monday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769) kcoyle via GitHub (Tuesday, 26 February)
Blog post Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) Simon Cox via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) aisaac via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) kcoyle via GitHub (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529) kcoyle via GitHub (Saturday, 16 February)
Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences Gray, Alasdair J G (Wednesday, 13 February)
Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences Karen Coyle (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) Lars G. Svensson via GitHub (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) aisaac via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) aisaac via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) kcoyle via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) makxdekkers via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) aisaac via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) kcoyle via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) aisaac via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) kcoyle via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) makxdekkers via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) aisaac via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) makxdekkers via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) aisaac via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) makxdekkers via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) Lars G. Svensson via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) aisaac via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) makxdekkers via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) aisaac via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) makxdekkers via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) makxdekkers via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) aisaac via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) kcoyle via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) kcoyle via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) makxdekkers via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) aisaac via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) kcoyle via GitHub (Saturday, 16 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) kcoyle via GitHub (Saturday, 16 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) aisaac via GitHub (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Jakub KlÃmek via GitHub (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) makxdekkers via GitHub (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) makxdekkers via GitHub (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Jakub KlÃmek via GitHub (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Jakub KlÃmek via GitHub (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) makxdekkers via GitHub (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Lars G. Svensson via GitHub (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) makxdekkers via GitHub (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) makxdekkers via GitHub (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Simon Cox via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Simon Cox via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746) Simon Cox via GitHub (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411) Annette Greiner via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411) makxdekkers via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411) David Browning via GitHub (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411) Annette Greiner via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411) Simon Cox via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411) David Browning via GitHub (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Tuesday, 5 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642) kcoyle via GitHub (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642) Vladimir Alexiev via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642) kcoyle via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642) kcoyle via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642) Annette Greiner via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642) Vladimir Alexiev via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) makxdekkers via GitHub (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) Simon Cox via GitHub (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) Simon Cox via GitHub (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) makxdekkers via GitHub (Friday, 8 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) Simon Cox via GitHub (Sunday, 10 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) Simon Cox via GitHub (Sunday, 10 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) makxdekkers via GitHub (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) Simon Cox via GitHub (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) makxdekkers via GitHub (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) makxdekkers via GitHub (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) Simon Cox via GitHub (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) Simon Cox via GitHub (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730) Simon Cox via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) makxdekkers via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Saturday, 16 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Sunday, 17 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Sunday, 17 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) makxdekkers via GitHub (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) makxdekkers via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) kcoyle via GitHub (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Sunday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Monday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Monday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84) Simon Cox via GitHub (Monday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728) Simon Cox via GitHub (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728) Simon Cox via GitHub (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728) kcoyle via GitHub (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728) kcoyle via GitHub (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728) Simon Cox via GitHub (Saturday, 16 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728) kcoyle via GitHub (Saturday, 16 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Saturday, 16 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728) kcoyle via GitHub (Sunday, 17 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728) Simon Cox via GitHub (Sunday, 17 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Sunday, 17 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485) Nicholas Car via GitHub (Saturday, 2 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Saturday, 2 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485) kcoyle via GitHub (Saturday, 2 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485) kcoyle via GitHub (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485) Nicholas Car via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485) Annette Greiner via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) makxdekkers via GitHub (Friday, 1 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Simon Cox via GitHub (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Simon Cox via GitHub (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Simon Cox via GitHub (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Simon Cox via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) makxdekkers via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Stephen Richard via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Simon Cox via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Simon Cox via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Simon Cox via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Annette Greiner via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Andrea Perego via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Simon Cox via GitHub (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Simon Cox via GitHub (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Rob Atkinson via GitHub (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) Simon Cox via GitHub (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) makxdekkers via GitHub (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317) David Browning via GitHub (Wednesday, 6 February)
Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2019 23:25:01 UTC