- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:26:10 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@makxdekkers said: > @aisaac I sort of understand that the choice of RDF properties vs. SKOS roles, or even a flat list like the motivations in OA, is a choice of style with pros and cons on both sides. Just to note that the two approaches are not mutually exclusive: the same term can be defined as both a `skos:Concept` and an `rdf:Property` - see [[SKOS-REFERENCE], ยง3.5.1](https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/#L896). For me, however, the main point for deciding whether to use `skos:Concept` or `rdf:Property` depends on whether `prof:ResourceDescriptor` will be eventually defined as an association class (as per @smrgeoinfo proposal) or something analogous to an ADMS/DCAT distribution. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/747#issuecomment-463844132 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2019 23:26:12 UTC