- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 01:31:48 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@andrea-perego yes this is a bit of a perma-issue. There are too many representations of 'measure' or 'quantity' already, but none have achieved universal acceptance. Furthermore, most come with a lot of baggage (or at least are just one tiny part of some huge vocabulary, the rest of which we have little interest in in this context. That is the problem with your original DQV proposal: it makes the simple case hard.
So, taking a leaf out of [Randall Munroe's book](https://xkcd.com/927/), I suggest crashing through and specifying this as the range of both `dcat:temporalResolution` and `dcat:spatialResolution`:
```
dcat:Measure a owl:Class .
dcat:unitOfMeasure a rdf:Property ;
rdfs:domain dcat:Measure .
dcat:amount a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
rdfs:domain dcat:Measure ;
rdfs:range xsd:decimal .
```
--
GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/84#issuecomment-464942850 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2019 01:31:49 UTC