- From: David Browning via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 14:42:00 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
The second link-based question is what to do with example ttl files such as [csiro-dap-examples.ttl](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/examples/csiro-dap-examples.ttl). From the ED, these link to our github repository. For our second public working draft, they link to a locked branch. We need to decide what our approach is for any future PWD and more particularly for the more formal candidate rec/published rec etc. A potential disadvantage of using this approach for REC is that it creates a long term/permanent dependancy on github for the recommendation on the W3C website. [Though many W3C assets/tools do link to github for documentation etc e.g. links from the editors [guidebook](https://www.w3.org/2003/Editors/) to respec]. Is it okay to have live links from a (hopefully) published REC to a (locked branch in a) github repo? @draggett - is there any guidance here? What are our choices? -- GitHub Notification of comment by davebrowning Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/377#issuecomment-461447455 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2019 14:42:02 UTC