- From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 10:03:44 +1100
- To: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Cc: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACfF9Lx4WtoGMOMrRwXWFfk8-MgExgRW57Bmhi8YNezimGnqyQ@mail.gmail.com>
profileOf means that all constraints of the base specification are transitively inherited - this does not imply that this inheritance is described axiomatically. Constraints languages may support such axioms, but for now its a significant step forward to be able to declare these dependencies and to find and classify related resources. As it seems a consistent challenge to keep separate issues of expressivity of constraint languages from description of a profile perhaps we should introduce a new tag: "constrain-language" for those issues, then we can deal with these in the profile guidance document. It also highlights the potential nature of Profile as a sort of dcat:Resource - at least thats the way it can be thought of - its a thing with some specific relationships we want to have very particular meanings (i,e. inheritance of constraints) but it otherwise describable using standard vocabs - dcat, dc, prov etc. the profile guidance document cant at this stage point to a constraint langauge that handles the inheritance axiomatically, so a combination of the profile ontology and a constraint language of your choice can carry the information, and implementations will need to work out how to handle the inheritance - for example requiring that each profile is published with a resource that defines the full set of constraints, or requiring that all inherited constraints are satisfied independently. On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 06:53, Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote: > @kcoyle said: > > > [...] This also argues for making profileOf conceptual rather than > axiomatic because it would be difficult to define an axiom that could be > true in such a wide variety of cases. > > +1 from me. I totally agree. > > -- > GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego > Please view or discuss this issue at > https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/485#issuecomment-460082500 using your > GitHub account > >
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2019 23:04:43 UTC