- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:25:11 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
This is actually being discussed here: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/747 a dcat:Distribution is not an artefact - its a metadata class describing an artefact, and performs the exact same role - its a qualified association between the thing and the artefact. It is "aligned" with dcat:Distribution in a separate file - so the debate (IMHO) should be whether the profiles ontology should be normatively dependent on DCAT. It is constrained by design to be consistent with the DCAT Dataset/Distribution pattern however, as the assumption is people will catalog profiles and arftefacts... -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/529#issuecomment-463858031 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 15 February 2019 00:25:13 UTC