- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 05:41:30 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
i'm against specific properties - originally I was thinking that way but there are two problems: 1) resources may have multiple roles - for example both validation and form building are typical roles for SHACL specifications. 2) such roles need to be defined in RDFS and OWL, hence logically in the ontology itself - and thus much more difficult to propose a set, but allow people to choose a different set or extend these roles. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/747#issuecomment-463497707 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2019 05:41:31 UTC