- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 22:24:08 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@nicholascar it looks better now. Wrt formatting, I would recommend to split the example in several pieces of code with 'real text' in-between, not one piece of code with the explanations in comment (especially regarding the parts introduced at "Now, according to the semantics of prof:isTransitiveProfileOf" and after). But well I can try this myself after the example has been stabilized ;-) Wrt the content, I'm still not sure that the 'OWL Profile of ISO19160-1' really qualifies as a profile. The more I look at it the more I'm convinced this is a ResourceDescriptor, even though it's not one created by the publisher of the original standard. In fact I would really recommend against PROF venturing into the area of profile OWL. It's a bit like saying that an SHACL file is a profile of the SHACL.... Plus, OWL has already some "real" profiles, like [OWL 2 EL](https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/) and it's a completely different level of profiling (well in fact I believe it's a case true profiling, but between meta-vocabularies, not vocabularies - anyway again please let's not venture there...). -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/643#issuecomment-460828102 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2019 22:24:13 UTC