- From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:43:59 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@aisaac Apologies, I probably shouldn't have said that the two approaches are not different semantically. I understand that word comes loaded with all kinds of formal connotations. I was simply trying to say that you can express the roles either way -- with RDF properties or with SKOS concepts -- and convey the same meaning, in the human understanding sense. I guess the misunderstanding is that you are looking at the modelling issues and I am looking at the practical implications. I do agree both approaches have the same issues. I just think that doing it with a SKOS concept scheme with some named individuals could create an expectation that someone can propose additional concepts to be included, and I think there is no way to do that if there is no organisation that commits to maintain the concept scheme over time. -- GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/747#issuecomment-463631363 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2019 13:44:02 UTC