Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)

As per the discussion on  #435 (for example [this message]( from @kcoyle ) it seems that this requirement is, in terms of the categorization currently made in the UCR document, both a general 'definition' requirement and a requirement that indicates a function of profiles. This means it would fit both into sections [6.10]( and [6.11]( 
The easiest option seems to duplicate the requirement, maybe with a slight difference in the explanatory text.
This would address the editor's note in [the section where the requirement is currently presented]( In fact, maybe the short-term solution is to change the editor's note to indicate that the requirement should be duplicated, until we sort out the other discussion on this requirement.

@jpullmann would you be ok with such duplication?
Any objection from the others?

GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2019 21:06:17 UTC