W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > February 2019

Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)

From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 21:06:16 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-460803483-1549400775-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
As per the discussion on  #435 (for example [this message](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/435#issuecomment-460692484) from @kcoyle ) it seems that this requirement is, in terms of the categorization currently made in the UCR document, both a general 'definition' requirement and a requirement that indicates a function of profiles. This means it would fit both into sections [6.10](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ProfileAbstractRequirements) and [6.11](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ProfileFunctionalityRequirements). 
The easiest option seems to duplicate the requirement, maybe with a slight difference in the explanatory text.
This would address the editor's note in [the section where the requirement is currently presented](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#RPFNCTERMS). In fact, maybe the short-term solution is to change the editor's note to indicate that the requirement should be duplicated, until we sort out the other discussion on this requirement.

@jpullmann would you be ok with such duplication?
Any objection from the others?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/275#issuecomment-460803483 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2019 21:06:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:12 UTC