- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:38:38 +0100
- To: <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
+1 for vocabulary too! Antoine On 12/02/2019 10:46, Svensson, Lars wrote: > +1 for vocabulary > > /Lars > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) [mailto:Nicholas.Car@csiro.au] >> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 7:38 AM >> To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org >> Subject: PROF: Ontology v. Vocabulary v. X? >> >> Could DXWG members please express an opinion here at to whether “Profiles >> Ontology” or “Profiles Vocabulary” or something else is more appropriate for PROF? >> >> After some discussion before FPWD we agree on the former but some comments >> about PROF’s use of terms from other namespaces, e.g. dct:conformsTo, to say >> nothing of owl:Class, indicate that others would prefer either the latter or something >> else entirely as they understand an Ontology to typically use only 1 namespace. >> >> If DCAT was being made from scratch now with approximately the same output, >> what would it be called, “Dataset Vocabulary” or something else? >> >> Short initial responses please so we can assess whether it’s important to look into >> this further or not. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Nick >> >> >> Nicholas Car >> Senior Experimental Scientist >> CSIRO >> nicholas.car@csiro.au | 0477 560 177 >
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2019 16:39:03 UTC