W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > February 2019

RE: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences

From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:12:28 +0000
To: <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
CC: <dfils@oceanleadership.org>, <ashepherd@whoi.edu>, <Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>
Message-ID: <5067ae14846e4120bb7d46387f791f2a@exch1-mel.nexus.csiro.au>
Karen - science-on-schema.org is based on schema.org. 
And in turn, the dataset/catalog parts of schema.org were based on DCAT 0.9. 
So this is no coincidence - see 

https://schema.org/Dataset 
https://schema.org/distribution etc. 

The close relationship with schema.org was already mentioned and a partial mapping provided in the DCAT-rev draft 
https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#dcat-sdo 

Or perhaps I am missing your point? 

FWIW I tried mapping one of the examples that we've recently been working on into schema.org -
Compare https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/dcat-issue317-simon/dcat/examples/csiro-stratchart.schema.ttl 
with https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/dcat-issue317-simon/dcat/examples/csiro-stratchart.ttl 
It is almost complete, though the schema.org `EntryPoint` model is a little different (more elaborate) than the proposed `dcat:DataService` modeling - see https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/dcat-issue317-simon/dcat/examples/csiro-stratchart.schema.ttl#L42


I think I already contacted the (geo)science guys for feedback on our work, but I've cced them again here in case I missed it. 

Simon 

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Coyle [mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, 13 February, 2019 01:43
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences

They appear to have directly borrowed from DCAT, using "data catalog"
and "distribution" as DCAT does. It definitely makes sense to ping this group for any comments on DCAT. Andrea, can you do that?

Thanks!
kc

On 2/12/19 2:57 AM, andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu wrote:
> Dears,
> 
> I don't remember if we have already mentioned this work:
> 
> https://github.com/ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org

> 
> (which, AFAIS, follows-up from:
> https://github.com/earthcubearchitecture-project418/p418Vocabulary )
> 
> They provide a way for describing repositories and datasets which 
> include most of the features under discussion in the revision of DCAT 
> (e.g., funding sources, identifiers, access to data via services).
> 
> It may be worth getting in touch with them, to have their feedback.
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Andrea
> 
> ----
> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
> Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC 
> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation Unit B6 - Digital Economy Via E. 
> Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
> 
> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/

> 
> ----
> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any 
> circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the 
> European Commission.
> 
> 

--
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net

m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2019 06:12:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:13 UTC