W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > February 2019

[dxwg] formally define competency questions for PROF ontology (#732)

From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 20:59:55 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-406971786-1549400394-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
rob-metalinkage has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg:

== formally define competency questions for PROF ontology ==
Feedback on PROF ontology as included a request to define the competency questions for the ontology. 

Below is a first cut following the lead of well-known ontology academics (https://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101-noy-mcguinness.html)

1. If a resource conforms to a specific specification, what other more general specifications does it conform to?
2. What related resources are available to describe a specification ?
3. What role does a related resource play in describing a specification ?
4. What form does a related resource take (what specifications does the related resource conform to?)
5. What names (tokens) might a profile be known as in a given context?

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/732 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2019 20:59:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:12 UTC