- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 20:59:55 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
rob-metalinkage has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg: == formally define competency questions for PROF ontology == Feedback on PROF ontology as included a request to define the competency questions for the ontology. Below is a first cut following the lead of well-known ontology academics (https://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101-noy-mcguinness.html) 1. If a resource conforms to a specific specification, what other more general specifications does it conform to? 2. What related resources are available to describe a specification ? 3. What role does a related resource play in describing a specification ? 4. What form does a related resource take (what specifications does the related resource conform to?) 5. What names (tokens) might a profile be known as in a given context? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/732 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2019 20:59:56 UTC