- From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 22:41:22 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@andrea-perego I take your point, and wonder if the use of "constraints" in PROF and in the role vocabulary needs more guidance on what is considered validation/constraint. As it is today, PROF doesn't contain much in the way of guidance, and the defintions of terms are quite concise. Perhaps this is not sufficient. Profiles guidance will include a section on constraints and constraint languages, but it will probably speak to a braoder defintion that can include non-actionable constraint declarations such as those in DCAT-AP's PDF document. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/721#issuecomment-461971941 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 8 February 2019 22:41:23 UTC