- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:42:01 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
After going through the nature of ResourceDescriptors in issue #769 it feels we are in a better place to reconsider this. I would say the shape of model is confirmed, but perhaps it is worth revisiting the name in order to make it easier to grasp the nature of things? options: 1) leave it as ResourceDescriptor 2) change to ProfileResource 3) something else i think there is no issue with making a change as we dont have an installed base (i plan implement as soon as we feel we have processed this first round of feedback and stablised namings.) so @kcoyle should we create a new issue to have a vote (or put one at the end of this long one) -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/573#issuecomment-466304479 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 22 February 2019 07:42:03 UTC