- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 22:30:01 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@aisaac , I share your interpretation of @smrgeoinfo 's proposal. Making a comparison with ADMS/DCAT, `prof:ResouceDescriptor` is an intermediate entity (not present in ADMS and DCAT) linking a `prof:Profile` (which would be an `adms:Asset` in ADMS) to one or more artifacts (which would be an `adms:AssetDistribution` in ADMS). Consequently, all what is about format, data schema, etc. should be an attribute of the "artifact" (as distribution), not of the `prof:ResourceDescriptor`. My concern is that I'm not yet seeing a strong case why we need an intermediate, abstract entity, instead of making `prof:ResourceDescription` a distribution, and the property linking to the artifact something similar to `dcat:accessURL`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/529#issuecomment-463828376 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2019 22:30:02 UTC