- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:08:04 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
My understanding was that we had listed only terms which have normative status, namely old and new DCAT terms, and terms borrowed from other w3c recommended vocabularies (e.g., PROV, ODRL, SKOS). dct and foaf are two exceptions, due to the fact that they are long-standing "standard". Have I misunderstood it? ADMS is a W3C Group Note and I am not sure if recommending vocabulary terms borrowed from a W3C working note is acceptable for a W3C Recommendation. This could be one possible reason why we have ADMS in Guideline examples but not ADMS in the vocabulary specification which is normative. I remember the concerns about relying on non-normative vocabularies when defining the Data web best practices. The assumption at the time was that a recommendation shouldn't recommend using something that has the working note status. I wonder if we should check this with our W3C contact point. -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/761#issuecomment-465222729 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2019 17:08:06 UTC