- From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 21:37:24 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@rob-metalinkage I agree that "the use of a prof:hasResource from a dct:Standard is not incorrect" - this is RDF, after all, and I looked at the ontology and the domain for hasResource is open, so it is any owl:Thing. The problem is that this isn't addressed anywhere in the descriptions of PROF so having it appear "unannounced" in a diagram is going to cause confusion. Adding standards here would require that "standard" as it is used in PROF needs to be defined. " 1. a Standard is implicitly a profile of itself with a empty set of constraints" doesn't cover "standards" as a whole, IMO. "Standards" is everything from rules for the manufacturing of ladders to the vitamin D content of milk, and I'm wary about stepping into this area without really thinking it through. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/731#issuecomment-460813575 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2019 21:37:26 UTC