W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > February 2019

Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)

From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 23:54:33 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-464925270-1550534072-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
We have the term "specifications" in italics so I assume that the intention is to define it. Given that the expression "base specifications" is used in various places, I think we should define it instead of just "specifications". 

My question is whether we will require that profiles include vocabulary terms. (If not, I'm not sure what the profile could consist of.) If so, we should say that any "base specifications" have to have vocabulary terms that the profile makes use of. That then gives us a hook for "base specifications" which we can describe as documents or files that, among other things, include metadata vocabulary terms that the profile can reuse.

GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/268#issuecomment-464925270 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 18 February 2019 23:54:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:13 UTC