Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)

An addendum to my comment above: although we may specify a role for an authoritative resource and people may expect to use that with things like PDF, in our (CSIRO) data consulting to government, we are moving to get machein-redable versions of things to be the authoritative resources e.g. mining tenement reporting data submitted to the Queensland Geological Survey must validate against a SHACL shapes graph which is normative and the description of requirements, a PDF, is only informative.

This is perhaps a fundamental shift from English to formal languages for authority/conformance assessment.

GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 1 February 2019 02:21:48 UTC