- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 22:13:14 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@dr-shorthair asked: > @andrea-perego , @kcoyle , @davebrowning do you have backward compatibility evidence here? How is `dct:accrualPeriodicity` used in practice? Yep. This is definitely used. According to [the report on usage statics of DCAT-AP in the European Data Portal (EDP)](https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/document/report-dcat-ap-use) (Oct, 2017), `dct:accrualPeriodicity` is used in 334,497 records - corresponding to 45% of the records of the EDP. So, there's indeed a backward compatibility issue to be taken into account. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/728#issuecomment-464222483 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 15 February 2019 22:13:16 UTC