Re: VOTE: include roles in next WD of PROF

So far we have 8 +1s, no other votes. We'll check again at the meeting,
but this vote will almost sure close with RESOLVED: Include ...

Please vote if you haven't already.


On 2/16/19 11:02 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> To move things along, we're going to try doing some off-meeting votes.
> This is a technique we've used in DCMI to great success. The idea is to
> end a github discussion with a clear decision, one that can be added to
> our records, similar to a vote during a meeting.
> I have created a "vote comment" here:
> The text is:
> PROPOSED: Include a core set of roles in the next working draft of the
> Profiles Vocabulary.
> To vote yes (+1), use the thumbs up emoji on the comment. Thumbs down is
> "no" or -1. There is a frowny emoji that we can use to mean the same as
> "0" in our meeting votes. And PLEASE VOTE.
> Thanks, Peter and Karen
> p.s. This particular vote only resolves a portion of the discussion in
> #747, but it at least gets that off the table. Ideally, issues would be
> granular enough to be concluded with a single vote, but we're seeing a
> lot of complex discussions which are having a circular nature. We'll try
> to sort those out.

Karen Coyle
m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2019 14:51:29 UTC