- From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:28:21 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@smrgeoinfo re:2 properties - that is close to what I was suggesting. I don't care if they are SKOS or RDF, but as @makxdekkers says we should supply a core of roles because in fact that's what people will use (Dublin Core being the proof of that concept). @aisaac I would like us to have some formal agreement that a core of roles must be in the PROF vocabulary as published. We can figure out later if they're defined as SKOS concepts or not. I'd like to set up a vote, so I suggest (vote will happen in a separate comment): PROF will include in the PROF working draft a core of roles, to be determined. Later we can specify those roles and their semantics. If no one objects strongly I will set up the vote - probably for early next week. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/747#issuecomment-463716162 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2019 17:28:23 UTC