Thursday, 28 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are uniquely named sets of data elements, such as classes and properties, that structure instance (meta)data [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- [dxwg] Privacy concern with profile negotiation (#782)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are uniquely named sets of data elements, such as classes and properties, that structure instance (meta)data [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- RE: dxwg-ACTION-302: Request chairs to identify procedure for closing issues about requirement definitions and urge ucr team to consolidate and close such issues as appropriate.
- Re: [dxwg] Reference ARK (#514)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference ARK (#514)
- Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile) (#195)
- Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile) (#195)
- Re: [dxwg] URI type of a profile identifier (#690)
- Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile) (#195)
- Re: [dxwg] use standard for profile identification (#45)
- Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777)
- dxwg-ACTION-306: Ask annette if #544 can be closed, else she should provide more detail
- Re: [dxwg] Consider requirements for specifying the order in which content negotiation is performed (#500)
- Re: [dxwg] "get resource by profile" should indicate profile applied (#588)
- dxwg-ACTION-305: Write up about previous alternate views work
- dxwg-ACTION-304: Write up some text for #662
- Re: [dxwg] Justify the use of opaque URIs for profiles (#663)
- Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678)
- Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678)
- Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678)
- dxwg-ACTION-303: Write up text proposal for #678 and ask kam to review
- Re: [dxwg] Add an example of a Client/Server scenario demonstrating profile inheritence (#748)
- Closed: [dxwg] Clear up references in conneg-by-ap (#542)
- Re: [dxwg] Returning profiles for QSA queries (#679)
- Re: [dxwg] URI type of a profile identifier (#690)
- Re: [dxwg] URI type of a profile identifier (#690)
- Closed: [dxwg] Advisability of non-HTTP URI examples (#775)
- Re: [dxwg] Advisability of non-HTTP URI examples (#775)
- Closed: [dxwg] Returning Accept-Profile in HTTP OPTIONS response (#677)
- Re: [dxwg] Returning Accept-Profile in HTTP OPTIONS response (#677)
- Closed: [dxwg] Review implications of OPTIONS cacheability (#510)
- Re: [dxwg] Review implications of OPTIONS cacheability (#510)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - temporal resolution (#776)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile) (#195)
- Re: [dxwg] How to express distributions provided as compressed files (#259)
- Closed: [dxwg] How to express distributions provided as compressed files (#259)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- Closed: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Closed: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- RE: DCAT subgroup - Telecon2019.02.27
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html
- Re: [dxwg] Change name from Profiles Ontology to Profiles Vocabulary (#758)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- [profgui] Agenda for Feb 28 sprint
Wednesday, 27 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777)
- Fwd: DCAT sprint on implementation report next week - please complete doodle poll
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Removing reference to issue 72
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Draft of sentence addressing issues #90 and #93 about revisions
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Removing reference to issue 72
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Annette dataservices
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - temporal resolution (#776)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - temporal resolution (#776)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT sptial resolution (#777)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - temporal resolution (#776)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT sptial resolution (#777)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT sptial resolution
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT sptial resolution
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT - temporal resolution
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT - temporal resolution
- Closed: [dxwg] Creating a specific section for data citation in DCAT (#762)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [profgui] Doodle Feb 25 & 28
- Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)
Tuesday, 26 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)
- Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)
- DCAT sprint on implementation report next week - please complete doodle poll
- Re: [dxwg] Definition and note of prof:hasToken (#723)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] ID25 to be revised (#9)
- Re: [profgui] Doodle Feb 25 & 28
- Re: [profgui] Doodle Feb 25 & 28
- DCAT subgroup - Telecon2019.02.27
- Re: [dxwg] Definition and note of prof:hasToken (#723)
Monday, 25 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)
- Re: [dxwg] Validity of non-URI examples (#775)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Validity of non-URI examples (#775)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Plenary agenda Feb 26 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Closed: [dxwg] Distribution package [RDIP] (#54)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution package [RDIP] (#54)
- Closed: [dxwg] UC 5.50 does not seem to be re:profile (#38)
- Re: [dxwg] UC 5.50 does not seem to be re:profile (#38)
- [dxwg] Validity of non-URI examples (#775)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- Re: [dxwg] Add dct:relation to the properties of dcat:Dataset (#774)
Sunday, 24 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- [dxwg] Add dct:relation to the properties of dcat:Dataset (#774)
- Re: [dxwg] Add examples showing use of compression and packaging (#770)
- Closed: [dxwg] Add examples showing use of compression and packaging (#770)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
Saturday, 23 February 2019
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Agb data citation
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Agb data citation
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
Friday, 22 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Examples for compression and packaging of distributions (#772)
- Re: [dxwg] Examples for compression and packaging of distributions (#772)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Examples for compression and packaging of distributions
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Examples for compression and packaging of distributions (#772)
- Re: dxwg-ACTION-302: Request chairs to identify procedure for closing issues about requirement definitions and urge ucr team to consolidate and close such issues as appropriate.
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- Re: [dxwg] Paper reviews (#708)
- RE: dxwg-ACTION-302: Request chairs to identify procedure for closing issues about requirement definitions and urge ucr team to consolidate and close such issues as appropriate.
- Re: [dxwg] add RFC 6906 to profiles ontology (#629)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Examples for compression and packaging of distributions (#772)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
Thursday, 21 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Add examples showing use of compression and packaging (#770)
- Re: dxwg-ACTION-302: Request chairs to identify procedure for closing issues about requirement definitions and urge ucr team to consolidate and close such issues as appropriate.
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- RE: dxwg-ACTION-302: Request chairs to identify procedure for closing issues about requirement definitions and urge ucr team to consolidate and close such issues as appropriate.
- Re: dxwg-ACTION-302: Request chairs to identify procedure for closing issues about requirement definitions and urge ucr team to consolidate and close such issues as appropriate.
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- RE: dxwg-ACTION-302: Request chairs to identify procedure for closing issues about requirement definitions and urge ucr team to consolidate and close such issues as appropriate.
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- Re: [dxwg] Returning Accept-Profile in HTTP OPTIONS response (#677)
- Re: [dxwg] Examples for compression and packaging of distributions (#772)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Examples for compression and packaging of distributions
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- RE: DCAT subgroup - Telecon2019.02.20
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: DCAT subgroup - Telecon2019.02.20
- Re: [dxwg] Returning Accept-Profile in HTTP OPTIONS response (#677)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Improving profile guidance intro (#417)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Temporal coverage [RTC] (#85)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
Wednesday, 20 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: DCAT subgroup - Telecon2019.02.20
- [dxwg] Add examples showing use of compression and packaging (#770)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles listing [RPFL] (#73)
- Re: dxwg-ACTION-302: Request chairs to identify procedure for closing issues about requirement definitions and urge ucr team to consolidate and close such issues as appropriate.
- Re: [dxwg] Issue 644 (#734)
- [profgui] Section 3 Google Doc created
- Closed: [dxwg] Comments to DCAT identifier section (#675)
- Re: [dxwg] Comments to DCAT identifier section (#675)
- Re: dxwg-ACTION-302: Request chairs to identify procedure for closing issues about requirement definitions and urge ucr team to consolidate and close such issues as appropriate.
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles have URI identifiers that resolve to more detailed descriptions (6.1) (#205)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- dxwg-ACTION-302: Request chairs to identify procedure for closing issues about requirement definitions and urge ucr team to consolidate and close such issues as appropriate.
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles listing [RPFL] (#73)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- dxwg-ACTION-301: Review doc and reference treatment and propose to close #45
- dxwg-ACTION-300: Update #195 to respond as initiator and prepare for closing
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles have URI identifiers that resolve to more detailed descriptions (6.1) (#205)
- Re: [dxwg] Web browser navigation of profile information (#239)
- Re: [dxwg] A client should be able to discover which profiles are supported by a server, and with which content types or other properties, in order to receive the representation most appropriate for their use. (#285)
- Re: [dxwg] Review implications of OPTIONS cacheability (#510)
- dxwg-ACTION-299: Remove discussion of http options from doc as per #510
- Re: [dxwg] Do we need to say anything specific about URLs (#592)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Issue 644 (#734)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof examples (#745)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof examples (#745)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof examples (#745)
- Closed: [dxwg] Pull together a list of all the dcat-focussed lists (#7)
- Re: [dxwg] Pull together a list of all the dcat-focussed lists (#7)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- Closed: [dxwg] New wording for Req 6.4 (#32)
- Agenda for CNEG meeting today
- Re: [dxwg] Reference ARK (#514)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference ARK (#514)
- RE: DCAT subgroup - Telecon2019.02.20
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Improving profile guidance intro (#417)
- Re: [dxwg] Criteria for listing properties for each class (#766)
- Re: [dxwg] New wording for Req 6.4 (#32)
Tuesday, 19 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Including adms:identifier in class descriptions (#761)
- Re: [dxwg] Compile DCAT-rev implementation evidence (#680)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] New wording for Req 6.4 (#32)
- Re: [dxwg] Order list of 'related use cases' and 'related requirements' (#37)
- Closed: [dxwg] Order list of 'related use cases' and 'related requirements' (#37)
- Re: [dxwg] UC 5.50 does not seem to be re:profile (#38)
- dxwg-ACTION-298: Issue #38
- Re: [dxwg] Create a template for issues so that they follow the use cases templates (#14)
- dxwg-ACTION-297: Check issue #37
- Re: [dxwg] Create a template for issues so that they follow the use cases templates (#14)
- Closed: [dxwg] Create a template for issues so that they follow the use cases templates (#14)
- Re: [dxwg] Pull together a list of all the dcat-focussed lists (#7)
- dxwg-ACTION-296: Will close issue #9
- dxwg-ACTION-295: to clean up examples
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Including adms:identifier in class descriptions (#761)
- Re: [dxwg] Including adms:identifier in class descriptions (#761)
- Re: [dxwg] Including adms:identifier in class descriptions (#761)
- [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- DCAT subgroup - Telecon2019.02.20
- Re: [dxwg] Comments to DCAT identifier section (#675)
- Re: VOTE: include roles in next WD of PROF
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Profiles Ontology -> Profiles Vocabulary
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Profiles Ontology -> Profiles Vocabulary
- Re: [dxwg] Collection implementation evidence for DCAT-2 (#767)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [dxwg] PR addressing issue #675 (#750)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Criteria for listing properties for each class (#766)
- Re: [dxwg] Criteria for listing properties for each class (#766)
Monday, 18 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Criteria for listing properties for each class (#766)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarification on foaf:homepage / dcat:landingPage for dcat:Catalog (#763)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Including links to Requirements in UCR document (#744)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- [dxwg] Collection implementation evidence for DCAT-2 (#767)
- Re: [dxwg] Specify the semantics of prof:isTransitiveProfileOf wrt prof:isProfileOf (#644)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile Guidance doc Abstract (#476)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
- Re: [dxwg] Criteria for listing properties for each class (#766)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
- Re: [dxwg] Prof examples (#745)
- Re: [dxwg] PR addressing issue #675 (#750)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Criteria for listing properties for each class (#766)
- Re: [dxwg] Further elaborating class Organization/Person (#765)
- Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)
- Re: [dxwg] Temporal coverage [RTC] (#85)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
Sunday, 17 February 2019
- [dxwg] Criteria for listing properties for each class (#766)
- Re: [dxwg] Making dct:accessRights a property for dcat:Resource (#764)
- Closed: [dxwg] Making dct:accessRights a property for dcat:Resource (#764)
- [dxwg] Further elaborating class Organization/Person (#765)
- [dxwg] Making dct:accessRights a property for dcat:Resource (#764)
- [dxwg] Clarification on foaf:page / dcat:landingPage for dcat:Catalog (#763)
- Agenda Feb 19 plenary
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- DCAT compressed and packaged distributions
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
- [dxwg] Creating a specific section for data citation in DCAT (#762)
- [dxwg] Including adms:identifier in class descriptions (#761)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
Saturday, 16 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
- [profgui] Doodle Feb 25 & 28
- VOTE: include roles in next WD of PROF
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Specify the semantics of prof:isTransitiveProfileOf wrt prof:isProfileOf (#644)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Update on conneg deliverables
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
Friday, 15 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Provenance information [RPIF] (#76)
- Re: [dxwg] Version subject [RVSS] (#93)
- Re: [dxwg] Version subject [RVSS] (#93)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
- Re: [dxwg] Version subject [RVSS] (#93)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by kcoyle
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof examples (#745)
- Re: [dxwg] Update all example RDF and image files (#658)
- Re: [dxwg] Version subject [RVSS] (#93)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- Re: [dxwg] Issue 644 (#734)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Updates intro 2
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Updates intro 2
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
Thursday, 14 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Version subject [RVSS] (#93)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial revisions to ID section
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial revisions to ID section
- Re: [dxwg] Returning Accept-Profile in HTTP OPTIONS response (#677)
- Re: [dxwg] Specify the semantics of prof:isTransitiveProfileOf wrt prof:isProfileOf (#644)
- Re: [dxwg] Update all example RDF and image files (#658)
- [dxwg] Change name from Profiles Ontology to Profiles Vocabulary (#758)
- Blog post
- Re: [dxwg] Profile Guidance doc Abstract (#476)
- Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)
- Re: [dxwg] Improving profile guidance intro (#417)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [profgui] Agenda, sprint Feb 14
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Address #542
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Address #677
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Address #677
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Address #542
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- Re: [dxwg] Version subject [RVSS] (#93)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- DCAT Public Working Drafts
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Version subject [RVSS] (#93)
- RE: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- RE: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- RE: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
Wednesday, 13 February 2019
- RE: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- Re: [dxwg] Version subject [RVSS] (#93)
- Re: [dxwg] Version subject [RVSS] (#93)
- Re: [dxwg] Version subject [RVSS] (#93)
- Closed: [dxwg] Inconsistent definition for dcat:accessService (#751)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT issue 751 - accessService is not sub-property of accessURL (#752)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- dxwg-ACTION-294: Set time next week for sprint
- Re: [dxwg] Returning Accept-Profile in HTTP OPTIONS response (#677)
- dxwg-ACTION-293: Update examples - following principle of symmetry with accept mime behaviours
- dxwg-ACTION-292: Write up set of possible models to realise req #290 for discussion
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- [profgui] Agenda, sprint Feb 14
- Re: [dxwg] Justify the use of opaque URIs for profiles (#663)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiate profile parameter and Accept-Profile header (#662)
- dxwg-ACTION-291: Review initial "no overlap" determination and propose explanatory note
- Re: [dxwg] There is a need to distinguish between distributions that package the entire dataset and those that support access to specific items, queries, and packaged downloads of data. [ID51] (5.51) (#267)
- Closed: [dxwg] There is a need to distinguish between distributions that package the entire dataset and those that support access to specific items, queries, and packaged downloads of data. [ID51] (5.51) (#267)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- [datadiscovery] Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- On ACTION-244: Integrate the profile schema diagrams
- Closed: [dxwg] Citations and Distributions (#433)
- RE: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- RE: [dxwg] Profiles Guide doc Security and Privacy (#478)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- RE: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] FPWD comment: use dcat:Distribution for Resource (#529)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
Tuesday, 12 February 2019
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT issue 751 - accessService is not sub-property of accessURL (#752)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT issue 751 - accessService is not sub-property of accessURL (#752)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- Re: Re: [profgui] Section updated, another added
- Re: [dxwg] Improving profile guidance intro (#417)
- Closed: [dxwg] Improving profile guidance intro (#417)
- Re: [profgui] Section updated, another added
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- Regrets for today, 2019/02/12
- Re: [dxwg] Mention and align with ODRL profiles (#368)
- Re: PROF: Ontology v. Vocabulary v. X?
- Re: [profgui] Section updated, another added
- Re: [dxwg] Mention and align with ODRL profiles (#368)
- Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- Re: Compressed or packaged distribution
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Closed: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Agenda for CNEG subgroup meeting 2019-02-13
- RE: PROF: Ontology v. Vocabulary v. X?
- Re: PROF: Ontology v. Vocabulary v. X?
- Re: PROF: Ontology v. Vocabulary v. X?
- Re: PROF: Ontology v. Vocabulary v. X?
- Re: PROF: Ontology v. Vocabulary v. X?
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- RE: PROF: Ontology v. Vocabulary v. X?
- Compressed or packaged distribution
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- PROF: Ontology v. Vocabulary v. X?
- [dxwg] Find from a profile description, uris of online resources available to convert it to another profile (#754)
- [dxwg] Demonstrate a client getting a resource by profile characteristic (#753)
- [profgui] Section updated, another added
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT issue 751 - accessService is not sub-property of accessURL
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT issue 751 - accessService is not sub-property of accessURL
- [dxwg] Inconsistent definition for dcat:accessService (#751)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: PR addressing issue #675
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
Monday, 11 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- Re: [dxwg] Packaging and compression of files in a distribution (#746)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- Re: [dxwg] Create regular text to refer to other Profile docs (#693)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat issue #675 riccardo
- Closed: [dxwg] Replace class .note with .ednote in DCAT draft (#226)
- Re: [dxwg] Changing some note's into ednote's (#743)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- Sprint meeting for the profiles guidance document - answer Doodle!
- Re: [dxwg] Mention and align with ODRL profiles (#368)
- Plenary February 12 Agenda
Sunday, 10 February 2019
- [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749)
- Re: [dxwg] Add an example of a Client/Server scenario demonstrating profile inheritence (#748)
- Re: [dxwg] Add an example of a Client/Server scenario demonstrating profile inheritence (#748)
- Re: [dxwg] Add an example of a Client/Server scenario demonstrating profile inheritence (#748)
- [dxwg] Add an example of a Client/Server scenario demonstrating profile inheritence (#748)
- [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Paper reviews
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Updates Intro
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Packaging and compression of files in a distribution
Saturday, 9 February 2019
- Keeping track of comments
- [profgui] ODRL inheritance policy
- Re: [dxwg] There is a need to distinguish between distributions that package the entire dataset and those that support access to specific items, queries, and packaged downloads of data. [ID51] (5.51) (#267)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Re: [dxwg] How to express distributions provided as compressed files (#259)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Packaging and compression of files in a distribution
Friday, 8 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify PROF's relation to constraint languages (#721)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify PROF's relation to constraint languages (#721)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify PROF's relation to constraint languages (#721)
- RE: DCAT Sprint 2 - Wednesday 13th February 21:00 UTC - feature: versioning
- RE: DCAT Sprint 2 - Wednesday 13th February 21:00 UTC - feature: versioning
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Prof examples
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Prof examples
Thursday, 7 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- Re: [dxwg] Contributors & Editors (DCAT) spec (#741)
- [dxwg] DCAT: Including links to Requirements in UCR document (#744)
- Re: [dxwg] Replace class .note with .ednote in DCAT draft (#226)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Changing some note's into ednote's
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Changing some note's into ednote's
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix to additional contributors' affiliations
- Re: [dxwg] Replace class .note with .ednote in DCAT draft (#226)
- Re: [dxwg] Contributors & Editors (DCAT) spec (#741)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix to additional contributors' affiliations
- Re: [dxwg] Contributors & Editors (DCAT) spec (#741)
- DCAT Sprint 2 - Wednesday 13th February 21:00 UTC - feature: versioning
- Re: [dxwg] Contributors & Editors (DCAT) spec (#741)
- Re: [dxwg] Contributors & Editors (DCAT) spec (#741)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Contributors & Editors (DCAT) spec
- Re: [dxwg] Add list of contributors to the DCAT document (#543)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Contributors & Editors (DCAT) spec
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- Re: [dxwg] Replace class .note with .ednote in DCAT draft (#226)
- Re: [dxwg] Links across DCAT rec, rdf files and namespace pages (#377)
- Re: [dxwg] Links across DCAT rec, rdf files and namespace pages (#377)
- Closed: [dxwg] Links from DCAT draft to (DCAT 2014) rdf (#320)
- Re: [dxwg] Links from DCAT draft to (DCAT 2014) rdf (#320)
- Re: [dxwg] Add support for errata in Req track documents (e.g. DCAT) (#545)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT issue 655 - Align endpointURL definition with the other aaaURL properties
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT issue 655 - Align endpointURL definition with the other aaaURL properties
Wednesday, 6 February 2019
- [dxwg] Missing reference to [DX-PROF-CONNEG] (#739)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of dcat:endpointURL (#655)
- Closed: [dxwg] Remove normative statements from non-normative sections of document (#353)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove normative statements from non-normative sections of document (#353)
- Re: [dxwg] Distributions, services and implementation-resources (#411)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- Re: [dxwg] Change to dcat:Distribution definition and note (#735)
- Re: [dxwg] Refer to Open Geospatial Consortium Profiling (#737)
- Sprint 2 - in lieu of DCAT sub-group (November-April schedule).
- Re: [dxwg] Improving profile guidance intro (#417)
- Re: [dxwg] Change to dcat:Distribution definition and note (#735)
- Re: [dxwg] Refer to Dublin Core Application Profile framework (#736)
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: modeling permissions, obligations, prohibitions (#224)
- Re: [dxwg] What is a profile? (#435)
- Re: [dxwg] Mapping of qualified and non-qualified forms [RQFM] (#80)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Updates Intro
- [dxwg] Refer to Open Geospatial Consortium Profiling (#737)
- Re: [dxwg] Add list of contributors to the DCAT document (#543)
- Re: [dxwg] Mapping of qualified and non-qualified forms [RQFM] (#80)
- Closed: [dxwg] Mapping of qualified and non-qualified forms [RQFM] (#80)
- Re: [dxwg] Refer to ISO profiles (#367)
- [dxwg] Refer to Dublin Core Application Profile framework (#736)
- Closed: [dxwg] Related datasets [RRDS] (#81)
- Re: [dxwg] Mapping of qualified and non-qualified forms [RQFM] (#80)
- Re: [dxwg] Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case (#730)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Change to dcat:Distribution definition and note
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Change to dcat:Distribution definition and note
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- ProfGui Sprint Doodle
- ProfGui Meeting Feb 6
- RE: DCAT Sprint - Tuesday 5th February 21:00 UTC - feature: dcat:distibution.
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Closed: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: Check normative references (#702)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Re: [dxwg] There is a need to distinguish between distributions that package the entire dataset and those that support access to specific items, queries, and packaged downloads of data. [ID51] (5.51) (#267)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Issue 644
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Issue 644
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles and distributions (#531)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles and distributions (#531)
Tuesday, 5 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Citations and Distributions (#433)
- Re: [dxwg] Citations and Distributions (#433)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Citations and Distributions (#433)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:isTransitiveProfileOf needs more convincing case and/or example (#643)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles and distributions (#531)
- RE: dxwg-ACTION-290: Do first cut triage of issues to make sure they are placed in doc.
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT Issue 702 (again) make DWBP and VCARD-RDF non-normative
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT Issue 702 (again) make DWBP and VCARD-RDF non-normative
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Check normative references (#702)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- dxwg-ACTION-290: Do first cut triage of issues to make sure they are placed in doc.
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference Data on the Web Best Practices (#450)
- dxwg-ACTION-289: Organise time for prof guidance doce editing sprint
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT Issue 702 - Added ? to all refs not explicitly marked as normative (#719)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles are "named collections of properties" or metadata terms (if not RDF) [ID41] (5.41) (#275)
- [dxwg] formally define competency questions for PROF ontology (#732)
- Re: [dxwg] What is a profile? (#435)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: Check normative references (#702)
- [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT Issue 702 - Added ? to all refs not explicitly marked as normative (#719)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:isTransitiveProfileOf needs more convincing case and/or example (#643)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference Data on the Web Best Practices (#450)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference Data on the Web Best Practices (#450)
- Re: [dxwg] What is a profile? (#435)
- Re: Plenary Agenda, Feb 5, 2019
- Re: [dxwg] prof:isTransitiveProfileOf needs more convincing case and/or example (#643)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:isTransitiveProfileOf needs more convincing case and/or example (#643)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:isTransitiveProfileOf needs more convincing case and/or example (#643)
- RE: DCAT Sprint - Tuesday 5th February 21:00 UTC - feature: dcat:distibution.
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference Data on the Web Best Practices (#450)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference Data on the Web Best Practices (#450)
- Re: [dxwg] What is a profile? (#435)
- Status of threads w.r.t PWDs
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- RE: Plenary Agenda, Feb 5, 2019
- Re: Plenary Agenda, Feb 5, 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- Re: [dxwg] What is a profile? (#435)
Monday, 4 February 2019
- RE: Plenary Agenda, Feb 5, 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:isTransitiveProfileOf needs more convincing case and/or example (#643)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- Re: [dxwg] Removed issue 371 as it is already closed. (#729)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Richer typing of relations in bag-of-files case
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Proposed agenda for DCAT subgroup meeting 2019.02.06
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- RE: Plenary Agenda, Feb 5, 2019
- RE: Plenary Agenda, Feb 5, 2019
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] What is a profile? (#435)
- Re: [dxwg] What is a profile? (#435)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Removed issue 371 as it is already closed.
- Plenary Agenda, Feb 5, 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- Re: [dxwg] Harmonization with ISO/IEC concepts (#722)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
Sunday, 3 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
- [dxwg] Clairfy definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
Saturday, 2 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
Friday, 1 February 2019
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] UCR: Editorial issues (#683)
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Broken sectioning
- [dxwg] Actions (DCAT) #173, #174, #197: use case for "wasGeneratedBy" and for rate (#726)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [dxwg] UCR: Editorial issues (#683)
- Closed: [dxwg] UCR: Re-phrase description of UC26 (#700)
- Re: [dxwg] UCR: Re-phrase description of UC26 (#700)
- Closed: [dxwg] Domain of dcat:hadRole (#640)
- Re: [dxwg] Comment from Bart Hanssens (#701)
- Closed: [dxwg] Comment from Bart Hanssens (#701)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by jpullmann
- Re: [dxwg] Minor editorial changes (#712)
- Closed: [dxwg] Remove inherited properties from the dcat:Catalog section (#718)
- Closed: [dxwg] Repetition in vocabulary section (#704)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
- Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution (#317)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- [dxwg] Reflect all 'Usage notes' into DCAT RDF representation (#725)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)