W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > February 2019

Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)

From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:01:47 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-467219819-1551135706-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I'm reluctant to provide a second option at this level. As soon as you have more than one alternative, you begin to lose interoperability. I understand that '1:50,000' etc is the cartographic tradition, and geographers routinely infer resolution from this ('what is the distance on the ground of the thickness of a pencil line on the map?'). But a length measure is more direct and less ambiguous, and also applies to gridded data. 

GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/84#issuecomment-467219819 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 25 February 2019 23:01:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:13 UTC