W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > February 2019

Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)

From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:46:49 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-465303080-1550609208-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
No they are not misplaced - this is a qualified relationship.  

specific relationships are an alternative pattern, but not appropriate because

a) we need other qualifications beside role (what the artefact is (its profile), how it is encoded, what parent it may have been inherited from)
b) we dont want to manage updates to an ontology - either let users define roles or provide a register mechanism.

(we can still define a small number of obvious roles relating to our Use Cases - the issue then is whether this should be in the ontology or a separate register artefact)

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/769#issuecomment-465303080 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2019 20:46:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:13 UTC