W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > February 2019

Re: [dxwg] Version subject [RVSS] (#93)

From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 11:55:36 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-463600598-1550145335-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@makxdekkers and @agbeltran:  I agree,  `dcat:Resource`, `dcat:DataService`  can be potentially versioned as well.  In my research activity, I have experienced a case in which even catalogs could be versioned. 
By the way, my feeling is that there is a "core part" related to versioning which is not much depending on the subjects we are considering. 

For example, both the unqualified relation [prov:wasRevisionOf](https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/#wasRevisionOf) and the qualified counterpart [prov:qualifiedRevision](https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/#qualifiedRevision)  works on prov:Entity, which can be any of the first class citizens we were mentioning before.

Similarly,  does [PAV](http://purl.org/pav/html) which specialize PROV with specific authorship, curation and digital creation terminology.

So in order to deal with this issue,
 I would suggest acknowledging in versioning section that versioning can be applied to any of the first class citizens classes and then, as a starting point, we can illustrate versioning with most common cases dealing with artefacts such as  Distribution, Dataset. 

GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/93#issuecomment-463600598 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2019 11:55:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:13 UTC