W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > February 2019

Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)

From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:49:11 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-467231898-1551138549-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Back to spatial coverage: unfortunately there are at least three respectable serializations of geometry in common use in different parts of the community:
- WKT - originally from OGC, now built-in to the Postgres extension PostGIS, and also used in [GeoSPARQL](https://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/geosparql)
- [GeoJSON ](http://geojson.org/) - which uses nested JSON arrays
- [schema.org/GeoShape](https://schema.org/GeoShape) - which uses a single space-separated array of coordinates

AFAIK WKT is the only one that also supports association with a [Coordinate Reference System](http://docs.opengeospatial.org/is/12-063r5/12-063r5.html)

Then there are others, like GML, What3Words, ... 

The [Spatial Data on the Web Best Practice](https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/#describe-geometry) is agnostic ... Should we attempt to provide any guidance? 

GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/83#issuecomment-467231898 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 25 February 2019 23:49:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:13 UTC