- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:13:26 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
+1 with @agbeltran , even though I may disagree with putting an additional definition, I think we shouldn't discuss the definitions in this requirement. It is only about saying that there can be several base specifications, not saying what a specification or (luckily for us here!) what this relation denotes. All of @kcoyle 's comments apply to our official definition, so if there should be comments, they should be in relation to the official definition, not on this poor side requirement here :-) If @agbeltran 's suggestion above feels too much like a general (and debatable) definition, then I suggest removing the part ", which are referred to as base specifications in this document, which is the role the specifications assume by providing the foundation for the profile. A profile can constrain all or some of the elements from a base specification." from it. -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/268#issuecomment-464900401 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 18 February 2019 22:13:28 UTC