- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:58:29 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Thanks Karen - my concern is that we have our eyes open about the risks and benefits of re-using elements from other vocabularies, and the granularity of re-use. #111 is the place to have a general discussion of this topic. For the range of the proposed `dcat:spatialResolution` nothing would make me happier than to be shown a solution that saves us from having to bloat DCAT with new data-types (s.l.) like `dcat:Measure`, but I can't find a suitable class in any of the well-governed vocabularies in the W3C orbit. If anyone has a candidate please speak up! Failing that, we need a structure for scaled quantities, so a new class in DCAT is the fall-back solution. I'll be fine with using `sdmx-attribute:unitMeasure` if the team prefers to lean that way, but I thought putting it all in one namespace was a little cleaner and saves implementers from having to consult yet another spec for the definition ... Alternatively, we could just make it an `owl:DatatypeProperty` called `dcat:spatialResolutionInMetres` with a range `xsd:decimal`. I'm kinda leaning that direction given these other complications. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/84#issuecomment-466218152 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2019 23:58:31 UTC