- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 08:48:43 -0800
- To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au, public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
- Cc: dfils@oceanleadership.org, ashepherd@whoi.edu, Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov
On 2/12/19 10:12 PM, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote: > Karen - science-on-schema.org is based on schema.org. > And in turn, the dataset/catalog parts of schema.org were based on DCAT 0.9. > So this is no coincidence - see > > https://schema.org/Dataset > https://schema.org/distribution etc. > > The close relationship with schema.org was already mentioned and a partial mapping provided in the DCAT-rev draft > https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#dcat-sdo > > Or perhaps I am missing your point? My point was a response to Andrea about whether to directly ping this group. It makes sense since they are using DCAT concepts. That's all. kc > > FWIW I tried mapping one of the examples that we've recently been working on into schema.org - > Compare https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/dcat-issue317-simon/dcat/examples/csiro-stratchart.schema.ttl > with https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/dcat-issue317-simon/dcat/examples/csiro-stratchart.ttl > It is almost complete, though the schema.org `EntryPoint` model is a little different (more elaborate) than the proposed `dcat:DataService` modeling - see https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/dcat-issue317-simon/dcat/examples/csiro-stratchart.schema.ttl#L42 > > I think I already contacted the (geo)science guys for feedback on our work, but I've cced them again here in case I missed it. > > Simon > > -----Original Message----- > From: Karen Coyle [mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net] > Sent: Wednesday, 13 February, 2019 01:43 > To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences > > They appear to have directly borrowed from DCAT, using "data catalog" > and "distribution" as DCAT does. It definitely makes sense to ping this group for any comments on DCAT. Andrea, can you do that? > > Thanks! > kc > > On 2/12/19 2:57 AM, andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu wrote: >> Dears, >> >> I don't remember if we have already mentioned this work: >> >> https://github.com/ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org >> >> (which, AFAIS, follows-up from: >> https://github.com/earthcubearchitecture-project418/p418Vocabulary ) >> >> They provide a way for describing repositories and datasets which >> include most of the features under discussion in the revision of DCAT >> (e.g., funding sources, identifiers, access to data via services). >> >> It may be worth getting in touch with them, to have their feedback. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Andrea >> >> ---- >> Andrea Perego, Ph.D. >> Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC >> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation Unit B6 - Digital Economy Via E. >> Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 >> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy >> >> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ >> >> ---- >> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any >> circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the >> European Commission. >> >> > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) > skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2019 16:49:15 UTC