W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > February 2019

Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 08:48:43 -0800
To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au, public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Cc: dfils@oceanleadership.org, ashepherd@whoi.edu, Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov
Message-ID: <3f4242dc-e65e-6856-cf79-0bf3cff68be5@kcoyle.net>


On 2/12/19 10:12 PM, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote:
> Karen - science-on-schema.org is based on schema.org. 
> And in turn, the dataset/catalog parts of schema.org were based on DCAT 0.9. 
> So this is no coincidence - see 
> 
> https://schema.org/Dataset 
> https://schema.org/distribution etc. 
> 
> The close relationship with schema.org was already mentioned and a partial mapping provided in the DCAT-rev draft 
> https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#dcat-sdo 
> 
> Or perhaps I am missing your point? 

My point was a response to Andrea about whether to directly ping this
group. It makes sense since they are using DCAT concepts. That's all.

kc

> 
> FWIW I tried mapping one of the examples that we've recently been working on into schema.org -
> Compare https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/dcat-issue317-simon/dcat/examples/csiro-stratchart.schema.ttl 
> with https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/dcat-issue317-simon/dcat/examples/csiro-stratchart.ttl 
> It is almost complete, though the schema.org `EntryPoint` model is a little different (more elaborate) than the proposed `dcat:DataService` modeling - see https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/dcat-issue317-simon/dcat/examples/csiro-stratchart.schema.ttl#L42
> 
> I think I already contacted the (geo)science guys for feedback on our work, but I've cced them again here in case I missed it. 
> 
> Simon 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karen Coyle [mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 February, 2019 01:43
> To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
> 
> They appear to have directly borrowed from DCAT, using "data catalog"
> and "distribution" as DCAT does. It definitely makes sense to ping this group for any comments on DCAT. Andrea, can you do that?
> 
> Thanks!
> kc
> 
> On 2/12/19 2:57 AM, andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu wrote:
>> Dears,
>>
>> I don't remember if we have already mentioned this work:
>>
>> https://github.com/ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org
>>
>> (which, AFAIS, follows-up from:
>> https://github.com/earthcubearchitecture-project418/p418Vocabulary )
>>
>> They provide a way for describing repositories and datasets which 
>> include most of the features under discussion in the revision of DCAT 
>> (e.g., funding sources, identifiers, access to data via services).
>>
>> It may be worth getting in touch with them, to have their feedback.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>> ----
>> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
>> Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC 
>> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation Unit B6 - Digital Economy Via E. 
>> Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
>> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
>>
>> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
>>
>> ----
>> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any 
>> circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the 
>> European Commission.
>>
>>
> 
> --
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
> 

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2019 16:49:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:13 UTC