public-html@w3.org from February 2010 by author

Aaron Bassett

• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)

Adam Barth

• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: Counter change-proposal for ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (Sunday, 21 February)
• Counter change-proposal for ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (Sunday, 21 February)

Alexey Feldgendler

• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Monday, 8 February)

Andrew Cunningham

• Re: what's the language of a document ? (Sunday, 7 February)
• RE: what's the language of a document ? (Sunday, 7 February)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Tracking bugs on Microdata and 2D Context (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Tracking bugs on Microdata and 2D Context (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: [html5-diff] updated (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [html5-diff] updated (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [html5-diff] updated (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: testing URL decomposition (related to ISSUE-56) (Thursday, 11 February)
• [html5-diff] updated (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Monday, 1 February)

Aryeh Gregor

• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Counter change-proposal for ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: testing URL decomposition (related to ISSUE-56) (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Document metadata (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: FW: Request that "conforming document" be better defined and more carefully referenced (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: what's the language of a document ? (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: Open video for an open web (Thursday, 4 February)

beowulf

• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Friday, 12 February)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: A question about HTML5 elements and SVG/MathML (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: Open video for an open web (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Open video for an open web (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Open video for an open web (Wednesday, 3 February)

Bruce Lawson

• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 9122] Obsolete but Conforming (Monday, 22 February)
• [Bug 9113] re: "axis on td and th elements" text could say "Use the scope attribute on the relevant th" (Monday, 22 February)
• [Bug 7744] Is sniffing required? (Thursday, 18 February)
• [Bug 8806] iframe srcdoc examples (Thursday, 18 February)
• [Bug 8953] URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• [Bug 8953] URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• [Bug 8806] iframe srcdoc examples (Thursday, 18 February)
• [Bug 7744] Is sniffing required? (Wednesday, 17 February)
• [Bug 8449] Remove extraneous material from Table section (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 6462] Self-reference and cyclic references in headers='' (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 7260] Create testsuite for table headers association (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 6181] Process table feedback (including headers='" issue) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 5823] Scope allowable on a td (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 5822] The headers attribute should be able to reference a td (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8747] Defining how a license applies to elements (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8752] Allow user to manage focus changes (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8738] Role-based navigation (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8666] Keyboard accessible date pickers (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8682] Tab and reading order for context menus (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8717] Usability and Element-level-focus-apis (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8723] image map is underspecified (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8647] Define tab order for IFrame (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8622] Activation behaviour and pre-click activation (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8671] Requiring the label attribute (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8648] Title attribute on the IFrame element (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8554] <progress> element should be labelable with a label (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8673] Restriction on command element as part of a menu (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8751] User should have ability to override automatic scrolling (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8144] Is a 'visibility: hidden' element being rendered? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8750] User able to override the hidden attribute in incorrectly rendered pages (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8657] Allow UA to reload fallback content if it fails to load (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8754] Overflow when text is resized (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8743] Auditory icons clashing with AT (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8652] what to display when images are not available is not well specified (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8740] How do pseudo-class selectors interact with WAI-ARIA? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8701] modify main role conformance info (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8698] add conformance criteria info to header/banner (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8700] modify contentinfo mapping and conformance (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8000] ARIA roles added to the a element should be conforming in HTML5 (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8753] Undo for drag and drop (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 7721] Drag and Drop is not keyboard accessible (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 7633] The use of @summary should be encouraged when circumstances warrant (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 7539] Since @summary is an official part of the table element, it is no longer obsolete. Suffienct warning language exists in it's definition that this entry should be removed (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 7740] Authoring advice for canvas is bad for accessibility (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8722] focus behaviour should be same for canvas regions as for elements (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 7404] "but only if the element is being rendered" needs to take into account <canvas> descendants if we're making them focusable (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 7011] [in off-bug discussion] canvas accessible fallback provision is under specified (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8716] Replace img Guidance for Conformance Checkers with Suggested Text for Short Text Alternatives (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8660] Context for areas on an image map (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8524] Guidance for Authoring Tool Markup Generators (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 7144] I am not sure if we are ditching ALT in favour of legend. You don't make this clear here. Some of your alt examples here resemble longdesc, which I am in favour of ditching completely. I'd be interested to see your answer on whatwg list about this (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8171] Implement the text alternatives proposal from WAI (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8644] Fallback mechanism for embedded content (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8645] Alt text for images (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 7362] inclusion of the title as a case where the alt may be omitted is problematic (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 6496] [blocked on aria] Allow <img aria-labelledby> to act as a caption (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 6494] Make the requiredness about alt more obvious (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8727] registration procedure for meta/@name values (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8845] Reference for (US-)ASCII (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8929] In the assistive technology section, explicitly mention role and aria-* (as we do a few lines above for "custom data attributes") (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [Bug 8727] registration procedure for meta/@name values (Sunday, 14 February)
• [Bug 8252] HTTP caching rules are _ignored_? What's wrong with extending Cache-Control to support user-agent caching instead of coming up with an entirely new mechanism? (Sunday, 14 February)
• [Bug 8818] Remove the srcdoc attribute (Sunday, 14 February)
• [Bug 8793] registration procedure for@rel values (Saturday, 13 February)
• [Bug 8784] politics in <param> example (Saturday, 13 February)
• [Bug 8647] Define tab order for IFrame (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8740] How do pseudo-class selectors interact with WAI-ARIA? (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8752] Allow user to manage focus changes (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8652] what to display when images are not available is not well specified (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8750] User able to override the hidden attribute in incorrectly rendered pages (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8722] focus behaviour should be same for canvas regions as for elements (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8747] Defining how a license applies to elements (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8738] Role-based navigation (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8751] User should have ability to override automatic scrolling (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8743] Auditory icons clashing with AT (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8682] Tab and reading order for context menus (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8644] Fallback mechanism for embedded content (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8754] Overflow when text is resized (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8753] Undo for drag and drop (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8648] Title attribute on the IFrame element (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8723] image map is underspecified (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8673] Restriction on command element as part of a menu (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8716] Replace img Guidance for Conformance Checkers with Suggested Text for Short Text Alternatives (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8187] Section 4.8.7 on video makes no reference to audio description (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 7721] Drag and Drop is not keyboard accessible (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8666] Keyboard accessible date pickers (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8657] Allow UA to reload fallback content if it fails to load (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8144] Is a 'visibility: hidden' element being rendered? (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8171] Implement the text alternatives proposal from WAI (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8645] Alt text for images (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8622] Activation behaviour and pre-click activation (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8524] Guidance for Authoring Tool Markup Generators (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 7011] [in off-bug discussion] canvas accessible fallback provision is under specified (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8554] <progress> element should be labelable with a label (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 7539] Since @summary is an official part of the table element, it is no longer obsolete. Suffienct warning language exists in it's definition that this entry should be removed (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 7404] "but only if the element is being rendered" needs to take into account <canvas> descendants if we're making them focusable (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 7633] The use of @summary should be encouraged when circumstances warrant (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 7362] inclusion of the title as a case where the alt may be omitted is problematic (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 6494] Make the requiredness about alt more obvious (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 8681] Separator menu items (Thursday, 11 February)
• [Bug 7744] Is sniffing required? (Tuesday, 9 February)
• [Bug 7744] Is sniffing required? (Monday, 8 February)
• [Bug 8892] HTML5 editor should propose changes within email list (Saturday, 6 February)
• [Bug 8891] No change or so-called zero edit proposals (Saturday, 6 February)
• [Bug 8321] change controller for HTML media type (Friday, 5 February)
• [Bug 8659] Media events to indicate captions and audio descriptions (Thursday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> (Thursday, 4 February)

Carlos Cardona

• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Monday, 1 February)

CE Whitehead

• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: what's the language of a document ? (Saturday, 6 February)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: [html5-diff] updated (Thursday, 11 February)

Chris Marrin

• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Monday, 15 February)

Dan Connolly

• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Thursday, 25 February)

David Bolter

• Re: Integration of HTM (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Ease of testing canvas accessible subtree (Friday, 5 February)

David Singer

• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Friday, 5 February)

Dean Leigh

• Document metadata (Wednesday, 10 February)

Don Brutzman

• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Tuesday, 23 February)
• request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Friday, 12 February)

Doug Schepers

• Re: A question about HTML5 elements and SVG/MathML (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)

Ennals, Robert

• RE: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Friday, 12 February)

Eric Carlson

• Re: Remove .played from media elements (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: media element seek algorithm: don't throw (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: media element seek algorithm: don't throw (Tuesday, 2 February)

Graham Klyne

• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Sunday, 14 February)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Counter change-proposal for ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Feedback on using <details> as a replacement of summary="..." (Thursday, 18 February)
• Feedback on using <details> as a replacement of summary="..." (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: what's the language of a document ? (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 1 February)

Ian Hickson

• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-31: missing-alt & ISSUE-80: title-alternative - Chairs solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Tuesday, 23 February)
• ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (update) (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Tuesday, 16 February)
• RE: A question about HTML5 elements and SVG/MathML (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: A question about HTML5 elements and SVG/MathML (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: Upcoming publications (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: Upcoming publications (Monday, 15 February)
• Formal objections retracted? (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Sunday, 14 February)
• ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: Setting selectedIndex before adding option with that index (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: XHTML character entity support (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: media element seek algorithm: don't throw (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: waiting and seeking events in media element seek algorithm (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Remove .played from media elements (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Tuesday, 9 February)
• RE: what's the language of a document ? (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Saturday, 6 February)
• Re: Ease of testing canvas accessible subtree (Friday, 5 February)
• RE: what's the language of a document ? (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Ease of testing canvas accessible subtree (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Ease of testing canvas accessible subtree (Friday, 5 February)
• "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Friday, 5 February)
• RE: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Wednesday, 3 February)
• RE: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Wednesday, 3 February)

Janina Sajka

• Re: ACTION-170: Update A11Y timeline for tracker related issues (Wednesday, 10 February)

Joe D Williams

• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: Open video for an open web (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: <object> <param> was Object H:TML draft for FPWD consideration - object (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Open video for an open web (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Open video for an open web (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration - object (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: H:TML Feedback (Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration) (Monday, 1 February)

Johannes Behr

• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Wednesday, 24 February)

John A. Stewart

• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Thursday, 18 February)

John Cowan

• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: what's the language of a document ? (Monday, 8 February)

John Foliot

• RE: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Conflict of Constituents (was RE: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66)) (Monday, 8 February)
• RE: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• RE: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Saturday, 6 February)
• RE: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Saturday, 6 February)
• RE: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Saturday, 6 February)
• RE: Open video for an open web (Wednesday, 3 February)

Jon Gunderson

• Canvas example with proposed accessible fallback for Bar Charts (Monday, 1 February)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: Counter change-proposal for ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Saturday, 27 February)
• Re: Counter change-proposal for ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Saturday, 27 February)
• Re: Counter change-proposal for ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Saturday, 27 February)
• Re: Discussion on ISSUE-79: meta-keywords (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: HTTP constraints on UI for unsafe methods (Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: [Bug 8252] HTTP caching rules are _ignored_? What's wrong with extending Cache-Control to support user-agent caching instead of coming up with an entirely new mechanism? (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: [Bug 8252] HTTP caching rules are _ignored_? What's wrong with extending Cache-Control to support user-agent caching instead of coming up with an entirely new mechanism? (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: [Bug 8252] HTTP caching rules are _ignored_? What's wrong with extending Cache-Control to support user-agent caching instead of coming up with an entirely new mechanism? (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Rough draft of Cross-Working Group Review Policy (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Wednesday, 3 February)

Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten

• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Tuesday, 9 February)

Joseph Holsten

• Re: [Uri-review] ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: [Uri-review] ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [Uri-review] ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Tuesday, 23 February)

Joshue O Connor

• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Tuesday, 16 February)

Julian Reschke

• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: ISSUE-82 - profile-disambiguation - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: Discussion on ISSUE-79: meta-keywords (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: Discussion on ISSUE-79: meta-keywords (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-86 - atom-id-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-82 - profile-disambiguation - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: [Uri-review] ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [Uri-review] ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [Uri-review] ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Saturday, 20 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Saturday, 20 February)
• no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: [Bug 8845] Reference for (US-)ASCII (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: [Bug 8845] Reference for (US-)ASCII (Tuesday, 16 February)
• IETF IRI WG status (ACTION-174) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Tracking bugs on Microdata and 2D Context (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Tracking bugs on Microdata and 2D Context (was Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Tracking bugs on Microdata and 2D Context (was Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: BUG 8818 - lack of rationale (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: BUG 8818 - lack of rationale (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: [Bug 8252] HTTP caching rules are _ignored_? What's wrong with extending Cache-Control to support user-agent caching instead of coming up with an entirely new mechanism? (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: [Bug 8252] HTTP caching rules are _ignored_? What's wrong with extending Cache-Control to support user-agent caching instead of coming up with an entirely new mechanism? (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: [Bug 8252] HTTP caching rules are _ignored_? What's wrong with extending Cache-Control to support user-agent caching instead of coming up with an entirely new mechanism? (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: testing URL decomposition (related to ISSUE-56) (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [html5-diff] updated (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [html5-diff] updated (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [html5-diff] updated (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-79, was: ISSUE-79: meta-keywords - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 11 February)
• XSLT and CSS as competing technologies (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: testing URL decomposition (related to ISSUE-56) (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 10 February)
• testing URL decomposition (related to ISSUE-56) (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Change Proposal for ISSUE-79, was: ISSUE-79: meta-keywords - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (ISSUE-56) (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Wednesday, 3 February)
• ISSUE-53 - HTML Weekly Tracker (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Tuesday, 2 February)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Wednesday, 24 February)

Kornel

• Re: BUG 8818 - lack of rationale (Monday, 15 February)

Kornel Lesinski

• Re: BUG 8818 - lack of rationale (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Video copy protection (Monday, 8 February)

Kornel Lesiński

• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)

Kris Krueger

• FW: 2010-02-09 Meeting Notes (Thursday, 11 February)

Krzysztof Maczyński

• Re: WG Decision: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: Upcoming publications (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: ISSUE-66: image-analysis - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Saturday, 6 February)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Saturday, 6 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Saturday, 6 February)
• Re: Open video for an open web (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Wednesday, 3 February)

Larry Masinter

• RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• action items completed (Sunday, 28 February)
• RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• RE: Counter change-proposal for ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Saturday, 27 February)
• RE: Counter change-proposal for ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Saturday, 27 February)
• RE: Counter change-proposal for ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Saturday, 27 February)
• RE: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Friday, 26 February)
• RE: HTML+RDFa, Microdata, and Canvas in HTML WG (Thursday, 25 February)
• "secret" mailing lists, w3c-archive, scope questions, etc. (Wednesday, 17 February)
• RE: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• RE: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• RE: [Bug 7744] Is sniffing required? (Monday, 8 February)
• RE: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Friday, 5 February)

Lars Gunther

• Open video for an open web (Wednesday, 3 February)

Laura Carlson

• Re: ISSUE-31 Change Proposal (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Friday, 5 February)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: Discussion on ISSUE-79: meta-keywords (Thursday, 25 February)
• A@coords vs AREA@coords (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Thursday, 25 February)
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Discussion on ISSUE-79: meta-keywords (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Discussion on ISSUE-79: meta-keywords (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re-registration of text/html (Saturday, 20 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: Doctypes with "[" after public identifier (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: Doctypes with "[" after public identifier (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: Doctypes with "[" after public identifier (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: Doctypes with "[" after public identifier (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: Feedback on using <details> as a replacement of summary="..." (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Feedback on using <details> as a replacement of summary="..." (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Doctypes that trigger quirks mode (was Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Doctypes that trigger quirks mode (was Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Doctypes that trigger quirks mode (was Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• <!--> and HTML5 (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Monday, 1 February)

Leonard Rosenthol

• RE: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: A question about HTML5 elements and SVG/MathML (Monday, 15 February)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: Issue 32 and Issue 93 dependency (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: ISSUE-82 - profile-disambiguation - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: Issue 32 and Issue 93 dependency (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: ISSUE-82 - profile-disambiguation - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-86 - atom-id-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-82 - profile-disambiguation - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-86 - atom-id-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Call for volunteers to test registry (Wednesday, 24 February)
• ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Call for volunteers to test registry (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Discussion on ISSUE-79: meta-keywords (Wednesday, 24 February)
• HTTP constraints on UI for unsafe methods (Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-85 anchor-roles partial Change Proposal (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-86 - atom-id-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-82 - profile-disambiguation - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-31: missing-alt & ISSUE-80: title-alternative - Chairs solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Counter change-proposal for ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-55 profile by amicable resolution (Wednesday, 24 February)
• ISSUE-4: html-versioning & ISSUE-84: legacy-doctypes - Chairs solicit Alternate Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• ISSUE-88: content-language-multiple - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• ISSUE-31: missing-alt & ISSUE-80: title-alternative - Chairs solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Saturday, 20 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: aftermath on Bug 8953 – URL decomp. IDL attributes when parsing fails (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Feedback on using <details> as a replacement of summary="..." (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Reverted HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft (2010-02-18) (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: New HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft (2010-02-16) (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Doctypes that trigger quirks mode (was Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: [Bug 8845] Reference for (US-)ASCII (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: [Bug 8845] Reference for (US-)ASCII (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Tracking bugs on Microdata and 2D Context (was Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Tracking bugs on Microdata and 2D Context (was Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Filing bugs (was Re: New HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft (2010-02-16)) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: BUG 8818 - lack of rationale (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: [Bug 8252] HTTP caching rules are _ignored_? What's wrong with extending Cache-Control to support user-agent caching instead of coming up with an entirely new mechanism? (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: BUG 8818 - lack of rationale (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Saturday, 13 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-83 dt-dd-semantics by amicable resolution (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-79, was: ISSUE-79: meta-keywords - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: testing URL decomposition (related to ISSUE-56) (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: ISSUE-31 Change Proposal (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-79, was: ISSUE-79: meta-keywords - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [html5-diff] updated (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Document metadata (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Tuesday, 9 February)
• ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Bug stats update (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Sunday, 7 February)
• Bug stats update (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: Ease of testing canvas accessible subtree (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Minutes HTML WG 4 February 2010 (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Rough draft of Cross-Working Group Review Policy (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Rough draft of Cross-Working Group Review Policy (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (ISSUE-56) (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: TAG Resolution on "resource/representation" terminology in HTML 5 (Wednesday, 3 February)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-83 dt-dd-semantics by amicable resolution (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: ISSUE-53 - HTML Weekly Tracker (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 1 February)

Manu Sporny

• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Saturday, 20 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: New HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft (2010-02-16) (Thursday, 18 February)
• Reverted HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft (2010-02-18) (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: New HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft (2010-02-16) (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: New HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft (2010-02-16) (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Tracking bugs on Microdata and 2D Context (Tuesday, 16 February)
• New HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft (2010-02-16) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Wednesday, 3 February)
• H:TML Feedback (Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration) (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Monday, 1 February)

Mark Davis ☕

• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Monday, 22 February)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 10 February)

Martin Kliehm

• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Tuesday, 16 February)

Martin McEvoy

• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Saturday, 20 February)

Matt May

• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Friday, 5 February)

Michael(tm) Smith

• [minutes] 2010-02-17 telcon, Media accessibility group (Thursday, 18 February)
• H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Monday, 1 February)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: TAG Resolution on "resource/representation" terminology in HTML 5 (Wednesday, 3 February)

Olivier GENDRIN

• Re: Discussion on ISSUE-79: meta-keywords (Wednesday, 24 February)

Paul Cotton

• RE: requesting one more extension (Thursday, 18 February)
• RE: requesting one more extension (Thursday, 18 February)
• HTML Weekly Teleconference minutes - 18 Feb, 2010 (Thursday, 18 February)
• HTML Weekly Teleconference minutes - 11 Feb, 2010 (Thursday, 18 February)
• RE: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-02-18: actions, issues, publication (Thursday, 18 February)
• RE: ACTION-127: Rough draft of Cross-Working Group Review Policy (Tuesday, 16 February)
• RE: request for guidance: centralized extensibility for HTML5 using X3D graphics (Friday, 12 February)
• {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-02-11: actions, issues, publication, decision policy, task force reports (Wednesday, 10 February)
• ACTION-170: Update A11Y timeline for tracker related issues (Wednesday, 10 February)
• ACTION-172: Insure Change Proposal for ISSUE-4 (versioning) also covers ISSUE-84 (legacy doctype) (Wednesday, 10 February)
• ACTION-174: Send info about IETF IRI working group, next meeting, mailing list, status of documents, etc., to HTML WG (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: ISSUE-127: Rough draft of Cross-Working Group Review Policy (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 9 February)
• FW: Request that "conforming document" be better defined and more carefully referenced (Monday, 8 February)
• RE: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Thursday, 4 February)
• RE: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Wednesday, 3 February)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: Remove .played from media elements (Wednesday, 10 February)
• microdata: the properties of an item (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: Microdata to RDF conversion (Tuesday, 2 February)

Philip Taylor

• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Doctypes with "[" after public identifier (Friday, 19 February)
• Doctypes with "[" after public identifier (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Tracking bugs on Microdata and 2D Context (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: Ease of testing canvas accessible subtree (Friday, 5 February)
• Ease of testing canvas accessible subtree (was: Re: Integration of HTM) (Friday, 5 February)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: HTML+RDFa, Microdata, and Canvas in HTML WG (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Friday, 19 February)
• Working Group Publication Requests and Approval (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Upcoming publications (Monday, 15 February)
• Status of the documents (Saturday, 13 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)

Phillips, Addison

• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Monday, 22 February)

Richard Ishida

• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: what's the language of a document ? (Tuesday, 9 February)
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Tuesday, 9 February)
• RE: what's the language of a document ? (Monday, 8 February)

Richard Schwerdtfeger

• Minutes: HTML Accessibility Task Force Canvas Accessibility subteam February 11, 2010 (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Saturday, 6 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Integration of HTM (Wednesday, 3 February)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: media element seek algorithm: don't throw (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: media element seek algorithm: don't throw (Tuesday, 2 February)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Relationship between the WHATWG and W3C (was: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 / ISSUE-2 Change Proposal) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: [Uri-review] ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Tuesday, 23 February)

Sam Ruby

• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) (Sunday, 28 February)
• WG Decision: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-82 - profile-disambiguation - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Relationship between the WHATWG and W3C (was: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 / ISSUE-2 Change Proposal) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: requesting one more extension (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Saturday, 20 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: New HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft (2010-02-16) (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: New HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft (2010-02-16) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: Upcoming publications (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Issues in HTML5 spec sections [was: clarification on Adobe Blocking] (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Minutes HTML WG 11 February 2010 (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 10 February)
• CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 10 February)
• ISSUE-66: image-analysis - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Tuesday, 2 February)

Shelley Powers

• Re: Issue 32 and Issue 93 dependency (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: Issue 32 and Issue 93 dependency (Thursday, 25 February)
• Issue 32 and Issue 93 dependency (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (update) (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Alternate proposal for ISSUE-30 longdesc (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: requesting one more extension (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: requesting one more extension (Thursday, 18 February)
• requesting one more extension (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Feedback on using <details> as a replacement of summary="..." (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Feedback on using <details> as a replacement of summary="..." (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: BUG 8818 - lack of rationale (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Sunday, 14 February)
• BUG 8818 - lack of rationale (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Issues in HTML5 spec sections [was: clarification on Adobe Blocking] (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Friday, 5 February)

Silvia Pfeiffer

• Re: [minutes] 2010-02-17 telcon, Media accessibility group (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: [minutes] 2010-02-17 telcon, Media accessibility group (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Video copy protection (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: what's the language of a document ? (Saturday, 6 February)

Simon Pieters

• Re: media element seek algorithm: don't throw (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: waiting and seeking events in media element seek algorithm (Wednesday, 10 February)
• H:TML: void element (Wednesday, 3 February)
• H:TML: deprecated doctype (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: H:TML: "document in the XML syntax" (Wednesday, 3 February)
• H:TML: "document in the XML syntax" (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: media element seek algorithm: don't throw (Tuesday, 2 February)
• media element seek algorithm: don't throw (Tuesday, 2 February)
• waiting and seeking events in media element seek algorithm (Monday, 1 February)

Smylers

• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 2 February)

Steven Faulkner

• change proposal: Allow the a element to have ARIA role attribute values other than link (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: ISSUE-85 anchor-roles partial Change Proposal (Wednesday, 24 February)
• adding image maps to canvas (Saturday, 20 February)
• Re: Issue 85 and (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ACTION-170: Update A11Y timeline for tracker related issues (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration (Monday, 1 February)

Steven Roussey

• Re: A question about HTML5 elements and SVG/MathML (Tuesday, 16 February)
• A question about HTML5 elements and SVG/MathML (Monday, 15 February)

T.V Raman

• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Integration of HTM (Thursday, 4 February)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: Re-registration of text/html (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: "image analysis heuristics" (ISSUE-66) (Saturday, 6 February)

Tantek Celik

• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Sunday, 21 February)

Tantek Çelik

• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Saturday, 20 February)
• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Saturday, 20 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Thursday, 11 February)

Tex Texin

• RE: what's the language of a document ? (Tuesday, 9 February)

Tim Berners-Lee

• HTML+RDFa, Microdata, and Canvas in HTML WG (Thursday, 25 February)

Toby Inkster

• Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile (Saturday, 20 February)
• Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs (Friday, 12 February)

Last message date: Sunday, 28 February 2010 21:07:18 UTC