Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile

Julian Reschke, Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:17:05 +0100:
> On 21.02.2010 15:30, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>> ...
>>> I agree with the part about data-*.
>> 
>> So then we are at least two persons that think data-* *should* be
>> included.
> 
> I was agreeing with whoever said it shouldn't be included :-)

I see that I could be misinterpreted. I meant to refer to Toby, who 
said:

> I'd humbly suggest that its scope cover at least:
> 
>   @class
>   @rel / @rev
>   <meta name>
>   @data-*

[1] http://www.w3.org/mid/1266626783.6234.30.camel@ophelia2.g5n.co.uk
-- 
leif halvard silli

Received on Sunday, 21 February 2010 18:30:31 UTC