W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:29:56 +0100
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: tantek@cs.stanford.edu, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Krzysztof MaczyƄski <1981km@gmail.com>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20100221192956809722.8d5e32c1@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Julian Reschke, Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:17:05 +0100:
> On 21.02.2010 15:30, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>> ...
>>> I agree with the part about data-*.
>> 
>> So then we are at least two persons that think data-* *should* be
>> included.
> 
> I was agreeing with whoever said it shouldn't be included :-)

I see that I could be misinterpreted. I meant to refer to Toby, who 
said:

> I'd humbly suggest that its scope cover at least:
> 
>   @class
>   @rel / @rev
>   <meta name>
>   @data-*

[1] http://www.w3.org/mid/1266626783.6234.30.camel@ophelia2.g5n.co.uk
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Sunday, 21 February 2010 18:30:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:14 UTC