W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: Integration of HTM

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:32:56 -0800
Message-ID: <63df84f1002031632o2e73698m44f9e6ea32ae7a30@mail.gmail.com>
To: "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>
Cc: schwer@us.ibm.com, ian@hixie.ch, public-html@w3.org
Sold!

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:21 PM, T.V Raman <raman@google.com> wrote:
> I vote for ADom ==
> Accessibility DOM.
>
> Jonas Sicking writes:
>  > Sorry to bring this up again, but can we please please please use a
>  > different term than "shadow DOM". "Shadow DOM" is already used for a
>  > very different thing in XBL2, and I'm worried about confusion.
>  >
>  > Several other terms have been suggested, such as "Fallback DOM", "DOM
>  > inside <canvas>", "Accessibility DOM", "Accessibility tree", "fallback
>  > tree".
>  >
>  > I think this would be beneficial for both XBL2 and for the
>  > accessibility discussions not to have these things confused.
>  >
>  > Best Regards,
>  > Jonas Sicking
>  > Mozilla
>  >
>  > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>  > > Ian, others,
>  > >
>  > > We are working on canvas accessibility for the shadow DOM and I am working
>  > > with the Mozilla team on the shadow DOM approach with some sample code from
>  > > Microsoft.
>  > >
>  > > As we discussed, the use of media query of alternative content I am working
>  > > to pull over a standard set of attributes from the IMS Access For All
>  > > specification. It was suggested that we preface these with an aria-, however
>  > > these are not part of the aria specification and preceding these with an
>  > > aria- dash would not give credit to the IMS Access For All effort.
>  > >
>  > > I raised the suggestion that these be preceded with afa- but we agreed this
>  > > would require agreement from the working group.
>  > >
>  > > For example, one attribute would be AdaptationType and we would define an
>  > > equivalent CSS Media query property for it.
>  > >
>  > > What's the group on using afa- to preamble each attribute name? ... or
>  > > should we just include the attributes without the afa-?
>  > >
>  > > As was requested they would not be limited to canvas content selection and
>  > > at the moment I see no naming conflicts with existing HTML 5 attributes.
>  > >
>  > > Rich
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Rich Schwerdtfeger
>  > > Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
>
Received on Thursday, 4 February 2010 00:33:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:13 UTC