W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: Discussion on ISSUE-79: meta-keywords

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:11:06 +0100
Message-ID: <4B85337A.7060208@gmx.de>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 24.02.2010 13:44, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> I support this change proposal. But I think that Julian should update
> the section about positive and negative effects:
>
>>> 1. Positive Effects
>>>
>>> Documents using meta/@name="keywords" will be conforming again.
>
> 2) In addition they will be able to use them for specific purposes -
> such as search engines inside and outside controlled environments, as
> the change proposal explains.

I can add that; but I'd prefer not to post an updated CP unless needed. 
(Chairs?).

> 3) A third positive effect is that profile extensions (such as Dublin
> Core) will be able to use them. HTML4 gives example of such use, and
> more such use can e.g. be spotted in the examples and source code the
> DC-HTML specification. Not having this option will make DC-HTML pages
> invalid.

Note sure about this.

This issue is not about meta/@name values in general, but the value 
"keywords" specifically. How is that relevant to profile extensions 
and/or DC-HTML?

> ...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 14:11:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:02 GMT