W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

RE: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs

From: Ennals, Robert <robert.ennals@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:25:24 +0000
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <83D7DEC65EB438489DE261BD36F1F11F0148A6BD@irsmsx503.ger.corp.intel.com>
I support publication of all documents.

-Rob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Sam Ruby
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:26 AM
> To: HTML WG
> Subject: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context
> and H:TML as FPWDs
> 
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new revisions of the
> following documents in accordance with the Working Group Heartbeat
> requirements:
> 
> HTML 5: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/
> HTML+RDFa: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/
> 
> and to publish as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) the following
> documents:
> 
> HTML Microdata: http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/
> HTML Canvas 2D Context: http://dev.w3.org/html5/2dcontext/
> HTML: The Markup Language: http://dev.w3.org/html5/markup/
> 
> Additionally, and as we have done with previous republications of the
> HTML5 draft, the chairs would like to ask Anne to update the HTML5
> diffs
> from HTML4 to reflect the latest changes.  Given that HTML+RDFa has
> been
> introduced, and that Microdata and Canvas 2D Context have been split
> out, since the last time this document was published, the chairs would
> like to request that simple links to all three documents be provided.
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/html4-differences/
> 
> Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive
> responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Wednesday,
> February 17th, this resolution will carry.
> 
> Considerations to note:
> 
> - As a First Public Working Draft, this publication will trigger patent
> policy review.
> - As a Working Draft publication, the document does not need not be
> complete, to meet all technical requirements, or to have consensus on
> the contents.
> - Objections may be made on specific documents but not on others.
> Counting the differences document, there are effectively six different
> documents under consideration at this time.
> 
> - Sam Ruby
> 
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 01:26:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:01 GMT