- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:28:29 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Krzysztof Maczyński <1981km@gmail.com>, public-html@w3.org
Sam Ruby wrote: > ... > More relevant to a W3C context, if such a policy were followed, there > would not need to be both an XSLT and CSS. > ... I don't think that's a good example, as XSLT does lots of things CSS can't do. A better comparison might be XSL-FO vs CSS, in which case I'd argue extending CSS to do what XSL-FO can do, and potentially adding an XML-based notation, would indeed have been the better approach. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 08:29:09 UTC