W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

RE: Counter change-proposal for ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc)

From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:47:35 -0800
To: "'Jonas Sicking'" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: "'Maciej Stachowiak'" <mjs@apple.com>, "'Adam Barth'" <w3c@adambarth.com>, "'David Singer'" <singer@apple.com>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>, "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <chaals@opera.com>, <peter.krantz@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <000001cab7e5$b7315da0$259418e0$@org>
http://www.standards-schmandards.com/projects/government-guidelines/
a "Index of Government Guidelines for Web Sites" and many of them
seem to mention "longdesc" specifically (if you search), including
the Swedish guidelines for public sector websites:

http://verva.24-timmarswebben.se/upload/english/swedish-guidelines-pub
lic-sector-websites.pdf

Which of these regulations, in your opinion, are not important
use cases for HTML5 and beyond?

Larry
Received on Saturday, 27 February 2010 19:48:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:02 GMT