W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:36:34 +0100
Message-ID: <4B7931C2.9040808@gmx.de>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...
> Thanks.
> 
> Nits:
> 
> "The working groups maintains a list of all bug reports that the editor 
> has not yet tried to address and a list of issues for which the chairs 
> have not yet declared a decision. The editor also maintains a list of 
> all e-mails that he has not yet tried to address. These bugs, issues, 
> and e-mails apply to all HTML specifications, not just this one."
> 
> The first link
> 
>   a list of all bug reports that the editor has not yet tried to address
> 
> produces zero results, so it appears something is wrong with the query 
> part.
> ...

This is not fixed. Should I open a bug report?

> "These bugs, issues, and e-mails apply to all HTML specifications, not 
> just this one."
> 
> s/HTML specifications/specification/
> 
> unless we want to discuss what exactly an "HTML specification" is :-)

This is not fixed. Should I open a bug report?

> Also, if we include links to BugZilla queries in the first place, why 
> not make them specific to this draft?
> 
> Finally, more alignment with the sister specification (RDFa) would be 
> good. It currently has:
> 
> "The publication of this document by the W3C as a W3C Working Draft does 
> not imply endorsement by the W3C HTML Working Group or the W3C as a 
> whole. In particular,
> 
>     * There are one or more alternate methods of adding data without 
> using RDFa, such as [microdata].
>     * There are discussions of alternate extensibility mechanisms, 
> covered in [issue-41], which might allow other ways of integrating RDFa.
>     * There is concern that continued development of this document 
> belongs in a different working group."
> 
> which I think is very helpful in understanding the status of these 
> documents.
> ...

Raised as <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9001>.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 15 February 2010 11:37:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:01 GMT