I withdraw my previously expressed support for the current text in the draft about this. I find the apparent consensus position which has emerged in the meantime much preferable. The reference to UAAG should be made more prominent, possibly also by linking to it from a few places other than the recommended reading section, thus subsuming the issue. > I think we do a disservice to users by not mentioning explicit > techniques. Ian, the right place for those is the UAAG 2.0 spec currently under development, so if you think you've got valuable input to provide, I encourage you to go ahead. Best regards, Krzysztof MaczyńskiReceived on Saturday, 6 February 2010 23:49:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:01 GMT