- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:24:38 -0800
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
On Feb 15, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: >> Here's a counter-proposal for ISSUE-30: > > Thanks! I've updated http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html > > Potential next steps: > > 0. Amicable Resolution > 3. Discussion > 4. Call for Consensus > 6. Poll or Vote Even though it's a day past the deadline, I'd like to request an extra week to write up a third alternate proposal. My alternative would propose making the longdesc attribute conforming, but with a mandatory validator warning. Sam and/or Paul, can you please advise whether this would be acceptable? Regards, Maciej
Received on Monday, 15 February 2010 21:25:12 UTC