W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:08:45 +0100
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100202160845007901.12a1f88b@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Leif Halvard Silli, Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:58:59 +0100:

Commenting Henri:

>>> 2) "hidden" in theory applies to non-accessibility unusual 
>>> modalities while "aria-hidden", in theory, only matters to 
>>> accessibility API mapping.
> 
> See above.
> 
>>> 3) "hidden" is part of the host language on the principle that ARIA 
>>> is a transitional solution and should become syntactically obsolete 
>>> as host languages gain enough features to address the use cases.
> 
> (1) Some in this group see ARIA as something that should "take over": 
> E.g. we don't need @summary because we have this and that @aria- 
> attribute.
> 
> (2) Your point 2) makes it sound as if you see aria-hidden and hidden 
> as same: we should need only one of them.

I meant "your point 3)". 
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2010 15:09:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:01 GMT