W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: [Bug 8845] Reference for (US-)ASCII

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:57:13 +0100
Message-ID: <4B7AA439.7080400@gmx.de>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: public-html@w3.org, bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> 
> On Feb 16, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
>> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>> I don't understand, why was this escalated to the tracker while the 
>>> bug is still open? It looks like Ian rejected it but then you 
>>> reopened it with new info. Shouldn't we wait until it gets addressed 
>>> again? (I do believe Ian has seen your latest comments and intends to 
>>> respond.)
>>> ...
>>
>> The information wasn't new, it just hadn't been added to the bug, and 
>> I didn't have the impression from Ian's latest comment:
>>
>> "Also, please don't file bugs on such trivial and unimportant 
>> matters." -- <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8845#c1>
>>
>> that he was going to do anything about it without the issue being 
>> escalated.
>>
>> (I'll be more than happy to be proven wrong on this)
> 
> How about we close the issue until he addresses the bug? If he resolved 
> it again and you are not satisfied, you can just reopen issue 101. Being 
> grumpy doesn't absolve him of the responsibility to respond.
> 
> (Side note to Ian: If you'd prefer to have this tracked through the 
> tracker instead, just re-resolve the bug.)

In the meantime, Anne has decided the right thing was to close the 
Bugzilla bug.

Anyway, I really don't care we manage the process to resolve it as long 
as it happens. It's a shame this - which really is an editorial issue - 
apparently needs a ton of mailing list postings and a two-stage 
escalation process.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 13:57:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:14 UTC