W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

RE: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts)

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:07:33 -0800
To: "julian.reschke@gmx.de" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D737144@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
I thought they were different specs? Doesn't the WHATWG version contains additional material which is out of scope for the W3C HTML working group?

Maybe D. Hyatt helped with the split?

Larry
--
http://larry.masinter.net


-----Original Message-----
From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Julian Reschke
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 6:39 AM
To: Maciej Stachowiak
Cc: Ian Hickson; Paul Cotton; public-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts)

Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> ...
> [HTML5]
> HTML 5 (work in progress), I. Hickson, D. Hyatt, editors. W3C, 2008.
> HTML 5 (work in progress), I. Hickson, editor. WHATWG, 2008.
> ...

Sounds good, as far as these are essentially the same specs.

That being said: if they are, why do they have different editors listed?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 5 February 2010 16:08:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:13 UTC