I thought they were different specs? Doesn't the WHATWG version contains additional material which is out of scope for the W3C HTML working group? Maybe D. Hyatt helped with the split? Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net -----Original Message----- From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Julian Reschke Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 6:39 AM To: Maciej Stachowiak Cc: Ian Hickson; Paul Cotton; public-html@w3.org Subject: Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > ... > [HTML5] > HTML 5 (work in progress), I. Hickson, D. Hyatt, editors. W3C, 2008. > HTML 5 (work in progress), I. Hickson, editor. WHATWG, 2008. > ... Sounds good, as far as these are essentially the same specs. That being said: if they are, why do they have different editors listed? Best regards, JulianReceived on Friday, 5 February 2010 16:08:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:01 GMT