- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:30:10 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: tantek@cs.stanford.edu, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Krzysztof Maczyński <1981km@gmail.com>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, public-html@w3.org
Julian Reschke, Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:52:27 +0100: > On 21.02.2010 09:42, Tantek Celik wrote: >> Indeed I have no intent to expand the functionality of the profile >> attribute beyond what is minimally needed for locally scoped >> follow-your-nose functionality for microformats (class and rel >> effectively, rev being deprecated), RDFa, and potentially microdata >> as well. > > I think we need to include DC-HTML, and eRDF. > >> In short, nothing for meta name (invisible data antipattern), and >> nothing for data-* which is not intended for use as shared >> vocabulary (as far as I can tell from reading the spec). > > ...which *does* mean that meta/@name needs to be included. > > I understand the antipattern argument, but that's orthogonal to the > definition of @profile. > > I agree with the part about data-*. So then we are at least two persons that think data-* *should* be included. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Sunday, 21 February 2010 14:30:46 UTC