W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:52:05 -0800
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <B1C9866E-48E2-455E-87E5-EB943A92C1CB@apple.com>
To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>

On Feb 12, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Shelley Powers wrote:

>
> Actually, not all issues are recorded in the HTML 5 document. It  
> would seem that several issues I'm writing change proposals were  
> never upgraded from Raised issues to Open Issues, which they should  
> have been when I volunteered to write change proposals.
>
> Can I get these items upgraded, so they do appear in the HTML5  
> document?

I don't think OPEN vs RAISED makes a difference for inline indicators  
in the draft. ISSUES just need a section annotation in the tracker  
issue. For example this one from ISSUE-41:

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/41
HTML5-SPEC-SECTIONS [semantics-0 extensibility]

ISSUE-9 (currently a RAISED issue) has this annotation and shows up in  
the draft:

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/9
HTML5-SPEC-SECTIONS [video]
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#video

I believe James Graham is the expert on the annotation syntax. I would  
appreciate it if he, or anyone else who is familiar with how this  
works, would mark up the recent crop of issues.

Regards,
Maciej

(That being said, issues with someone actively working on them should  
indeed be in OPEN state.)
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 19:52:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:14 UTC