W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: ISSUE-30 counter-proposal

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:40:33 -0500
Message-ID: <4B79CD61.9020208@intertwingly.net>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> 
> On Feb 15, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> 
>> Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> Here's a counter-proposal for ISSUE-30:
>>
>> Thanks!  I've updated http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html
>>
>> Potential next steps:
>>
>> 0. Amicable Resolution
>> 3. Discussion
>> 4. Call for Consensus
>> 6. Poll or Vote
> 
> Even though it's a day past the deadline, I'd like to request an extra 
> week to write up a third alternate proposal. My alternative would 
> propose making the longdesc attribute conforming, but with a mandatory 
> validator warning. Sam and/or Paul, can you please advise whether this 
> would be acceptable?

I've updated issue-status to reflect that the next step is on you, with 
a date of 22 Feb.

> Regards,
> Maciej

- Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 15 February 2010 22:41:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:01 GMT